...the people said.
So Kodak are selling Imax an idea, so that Imax will no longer buy Kodak film?
I think that's it. And if they don't start making money off it, someone else will come along and make something similar.I think even though Kodak is not selling the patent to IMAX, IMAX will eventually use less and less Kodak film, it it because they are installing all IMAX digital projector to new IMAX screen.
I have seen quite a few companies go under in the last 20 years, and the clearest sign of terminal tail spin is a big press release for marginal success stories. A company burning almost 1 billion touting a sale of 10 million would certainly fall into this category. Especially if this sale cuts into some other market for that company
If Kodak's patents are worth so much, why isn't Kodak using them to make profitable product rather than selling or licencing them?
Kodak has the advantage that it doesn't need to pay for these patented ideas.
Steve.
If Kodak's patents are worth so much, why isn't Kodak using them to make profitable product rather than selling or licencing them?
Kodak has the advantage that it doesn't need to pay for these patented ideas.
Steve.
Sadly, that's very true....
"The cash will be used for general corporate purposes, said Gerard Meuchner, a spokesman for Eastman Kodak".....basically the sale of a capital asset to meet revenue deficits. Not a good long term answer...it's a bit like selling the family silver to pay this week's food bill.
I have seen quite a few companies go under in the last 20 years, and the clearest sign of terminal tail spin is a big press release for marginal success stories. A company burning almost 1 billion touting a sale of 10 million would certainly fall into this category. Especially if this sale cuts into some other market for that company
Sadly, that's very true....
"...it's a bit like selling the family silver to pay this week's food bill.
From what I gathered, large projection size is a main benefit of the Kodak technology.IMAX Digital is in no way similar to the traditional 15 perf 70mm film version. The resolution is apparently only slightly better than standard 2K digital cinema, and the screen size is dramatically smaller.
Tom
It's not at all like that. It's licensing technology over ten years.
They are making some money from an asset. Not enough for financial stability on this one deal, but it's still $10M. Complain about EK's past business decisions, sure, but this is not something to have an issue with today.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?