Kodak Hypo Clear question

Old bench and tree

D
Old bench and tree

  • 0
  • 0
  • 4
On Ramp

A
On Ramp

  • 1
  • 0
  • 8
Hensol woods

Hensol woods

  • 9
  • 3
  • 78
Harbour at dusk

A
Harbour at dusk

  • 4
  • 0
  • 58

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,716
Messages
2,779,790
Members
99,686
Latest member
alixmedia
Recent bookmarks
0

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,959
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
It's worth noting that the Ilford sequence for optimum permanence calls for a 20-minute final wash in running water. The sequence with the five-minute final wash is for a much lower standard of permanence (or a typographical error!). I certainly wouldn't trust a five-minute wash to do the job!

In any case, testing is your friend here; HT-2 for residual hypo...

Best,

Doremus

I'm affraid this is not correct. The following text precedes the Ilford archival sequence (5-minute final wash) in all their documents: When optimum permanence is needed, perhaps for archival storage of prints, the following fixing and washing sequences at18–24°C/65–75°F (including wash water) are recommended using ILFORD WASHAID.

It's amazing how low the thiosulfate levels go after HCA and a 5 min wash only as can be seen from these two documents:

http://www.film-and-darkroom-user.org.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=296 (Part one)
http://www.film-and-darkroom-user.org.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=344 (Part two)
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,619
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
Yeah, I’m not as young as I used to be... but I still push myself hard. I’ve been printing quite regularly for the past 10 years (fifteen to twenty 16x20/20x24 per session), one or two weekly sessions.

And since the Covid social distancing saga, I’ve been printing 20 16x20 a day, for the past 60 days. I have now switched to 11x14 but I plan to start 10x24 soon. I give myself two weeks to finish the 10x24, and then I’m back to 11x14 fb.

If I follow the present pace, I should be finished by october. I’m lucky to have the worthy negatives, that’s what’s keeping me going.

btw, if you are curious to see my “live” printing sessions, I invite you to take a look at my Instagram stories. There are about 620 15-seconds snippets.
My instagram is Ned_bojic
Outstanding work!
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,586
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
I'm afraid this is not correct. The following text precedes the Ilford archival sequence (5-minute final wash) in all their documents: When optimum permanence is needed, perhaps for archival storage of prints, the following fixing and washing sequences at18–24°C/65–75°F (including wash water) are recommended using ILFORD WASHAID.

It's amazing how low the thiosulfate levels go after HCA and a 5 min wash only as can be seen from these two documents:

http://www.film-and-darkroom-user.org.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=296 (Part one)
http://www.film-and-darkroom-user.org.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=344 (Part two)

I stand corrected: Ilford does indeed indicate only five minutes of washing without toning. With toning, however, they recommend 30 minutes on their web page devoted to optimum permanence https://www.ilfordphoto.com/ilford-optimum-permanance-wash-sequence-fb-papers/ . This is what I was referring to.

However, I suspect something is amiss here. I see no reason why toning should increase final wash time six-fold... I'm not going to argue with Ilford, but I'd certainly never wash my fiber-base prints for only five minutes. Anyone who does should really do tests for residual hypo to make sure they are really getting a good wash. For me, it's 10+ minutes in a wash aid and 60+ minutes final wash.

Doremus
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,619
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
I'm re-reading the mysteries of the vortex articles. About every 3 paragraphs he's mentioning, to judge the process test with HT-2. This is the key, IMHO, until you establish a reliable, repeatable process, check and double check.
My final wash is a exercise in OCD. I have a mag drive pump hooked up to a archival washer, once through, toning, hypo clearing agent, 10 -20 minute pre wash. Finally I start with my archival washer full of 68°F water, put the prints in the slots and turn on my pump, let if run for 15-20 minutes, then open the drain and I add a syphon so I can empty the washer in about a minute. Then, very gently I take a 5 gallon bucket of water, that I have previously filled, fill the washer back up in 20-30 seconds and repeat. Two of these cycles is adequate but I usually run 3 cycles. The pump gives much better flow than running with any reasonable tap water flow rate and THERE'S NO DAMN AIR BELLS on the surface of the paper.
I violate one cardinal rule, I use the film strength Kodak Rapid Fixer for 1 minute, but I use the hardener. I do this because I still use a Pako Drum dryer, I bought 3 brand new fabric belts for it from Pakor last year. Without hardener the prints stick to the belt. I have been using these dryers for 30 years never had a problem. But you have to make sure everything is clean going in and maintain the machines. If you do no trouble.
 

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,959
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
I stand corrected: Ilford does indeed indicate only five minutes of washing without toning. With toning, however, they recommend 30 minutes on their web page devoted to optimum permanence https://www.ilfordphoto.com/ilford-optimum-permanance-wash-sequence-fb-papers/ . This is what I was referring to.

However, I suspect something is amiss here. I see no reason why toning should increase final wash time six-fold... I'm not going to argue with Ilford, but I'd certainly never wash my fiber-base prints for only five minutes. Anyone who does should really do tests for residual hypo to make sure they are really getting a good wash. For me, it's 10+ minutes in a wash aid and 60+ minutes final wash.

Doremus
With toning the paper is exposed to ammonium thiosulfate in the toning step as well, hence longer wash time.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
22,643
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
With toning the paper is exposed to ammonium thiosulfate in the toning step as well
This is true for selenium toner, but not most other toners. I think the reasons for longer wash times after toning are that (1) toning often takes several minutes or even longer, ie longer than fixing and (2) some toner components/chemicals may wash out less easily than fixer remnants. It all depends greatly in the toning approach taken and hence, the advice to wash longer after toning is eally a blanket statement that conservatively attempts to cover the most common approaches that may be taken in practice.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,586
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
With toning the paper is exposed to ammonium thiosulfate in the toning step as well, hence longer wash time.

Of course. That lets the thiosulfates soak into the paper fibers more and therefore needs more washing time. Toning in selenium toners effectively negates the advantage of the Ilford short optimum permanence sequence just for that reason. Thanks for pointing this out.

One wonders why using strong fixer for a shorter time even has an advantage if selenium toning is in the processing sequence somewhere. Likely not. I'm glad I don't mess with it.

Doremus
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom