I'm not an expert. I don't think that you will have a problem. I have starters for Kodak Flexicolor and Ektacolor (paper) and a Kodak starter for black and white (this is at least 15 years old) . My color starters are 3 years or older. For developer I think the main ingredient is potassium bromide and a little sodium chloride. Pretty stable stuff.I've been using Kodak Flexicolor Developer Starter LORR and purchasing it from Unique Photo:
https://www.uniquephoto.com/product/kodak-c-41-dev-starter-lorr-1-2l-6601074/_/searchString/developer starter
Often, this bottle arrives with 2-4 months left on the expiration and at only 30mL of this stuff per 1L of C-41 developer, I don't make much headway on the 1.2L in that 2-4 month timespan.
I'm interested to know if anyone has any experience using Developer Starter past the expiration date and if so, how long have you found it usable with decent results? At present, I just buy new so that my chemistry isn't expired and maybe that's the best approach.
Thanks,
Karl
Here is the 2009 version: https://125px.com/docs/techpubs/kodak/cis49-2009_12.pdfYes, you can mix Flexicolor in fractional quantities -- in fact, when I'm home, I have a document that gives the exact amounts to use for many convenient amounts of Flexicolor developer (Parts A, B, C, water, and Starter), for the standard, RT, or LORR versions.
Here is the 2009 version: https://125px.com/docs/techpubs/kodak/cis49-2009_12.pdf
I have tried it many times and it did not work well for me. I think it is fairly difficult to accurately mix part A,B and C partially for 1L of working developer. Maybe it is just me. But I really tried hard with little success. If you want to try and see if you have better luck here is what I will suggest. Mix part A and B with water (yes, without the part C) to make 5L of the developer. If it needs starter just add it too. When it's time you need 1L of the developer just pour a liter of this developer then carefully add 1/5th of the content of the part C bottle. In this case the accuracy will only be dependent on how accurate you get 1/5th of the part C. If it is accurate then your developer will work just fine.Hi @kabbott
For the 5L Developer replinisher, can it be divided properly and mixed 1L at a time--specifically: how long do the 3 parts last in an open container before expiring - if ever? I am shooting mostly ECN-2 now, so I don't have a need for 5L at once and would love to know that the 3 parts will last a while
I'm using the Potassium Ferricyanide bleach from my ECN-2 process. I haven't been able to do it with every test, but I've asked my lab to re-bleach and fix a couple of my tests and the base fog does not change.What are you using for bleach? Dark base can come from fog, but it can also come from incomplete bleaching of the filter layer.
I feel good about my ECN-2 fix and final rinse.
Cheers, I got the final rinse formula from this forum - formalin and photoflo. The fixer is form the ECN-2 publication.There's no significant difference between the fixers and final rinse
I think if it is formalin based it is called stabilizer. Kodak final rinse does not contain formalin. if your film is made before 2001/2002 time frame you need to use stabilizer. Otherwise you can use either one. One important purpose to use a stabilizer or final rise is to keep the color dyes on the film from fading.Cheers, I got the final rinse formula from this forum - formalin and photoflo. The fixer is form the ECN-2 publication.
Thanks! This makes sense. I was interchanging the terms. This made me wonder, though, about stabilizing ECN-2 films. I've been using Kodak Final Rinse, as they're all newer stocks, but curios if ECN-2 followed the same changeover away from formalin in the early 2000s, or if ECN-2 still requires formalin?I think if it is formalin based it is called stabilizer. Kodak final rinse does not contain formalin. if your film is made before 2001/2002 time frame you need to use stabilizer. Otherwise you can use either one. One important purpose to use a stabilizer or final rise is to keep the color dyes on the film from fading.
Given the scale of ECN-II operations for film makers I'd say it was very important for Kodak to eliminate Formaldehyde from the process for health and safety reasons.
Hugely helpful! This puts my mind at ease about re-stabbing a year's worth of rolls cut into strips.ECN-II stabilizer is only a surfactant. No formaldehyde required.
Given the scale of ECN-II operations for film makers I'd say it was very important for Kodak to eliminate Formaldehyde from the process for health and safety reasons.
I started thinking this as well. I've been processing and printing my own BW for decades, but am only getting into DIY color after getting some VisionI'm pretty sure ECN-2 films got this upgrade first, followed by C-41 (at least at Kodak).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?