• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Kodak Film Fixer got on pots and pan, when doing home developing. how should I clean this to use for food consumption?

I just checked the Safety Data Sheet for Ilford Rapid Fixer. I can't remember looking up any other photo chemical with as few hazard warnings. (The Freestyle web site is the best source of Safety Data Sheets I've found for photo chemicals.)

Of course the SDS does not apply to used fixer. I do drop off a gallon jug of used fixer at the local household hazardous waste disposal site every year or so.
 

Wot he sez:

I scrub the sink with BarKeepers Friend after I have used photo chemicals in the sink. Just give the pots a good scrubbing.
 
Good thought about heat and chemicals. Heat do some crazy things to chemicals that otherwise would be harmless.

Yep. Heating coffee or bacon too much produces acrylamides, a known carcinogen, which is why every cup of coffee in California has a Proposition 65 warning label.

Of course, so do hammers.

And you'd need to drink a couple hundred gallons of coffee a day to be at risk (and you'd have more serious issues then anyway){Moderator's edit}.

And don't eat your hammer, it might be bad for you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Sirius Glass
  • Deleted
  • Reason: politics - although the hammer question is definitely interesting
  • Marcelo Paniagua
  • Deleted
  • Reason: politics - although the hammer question is definitely interesting
  • Agulliver
  • Deleted
  • Reason: politics - although the hammer question is definitely interesting
  • grat
  • Deleted
  • Reason: politics - although the hammer question is definitely interesting
  • Marcelo Paniagua
  • Deleted
  • Reason: politics - although the hammer question is definitely interesting
Most chemicals used in regular photo processing are very water-soluble, so if the surface is not absorbent, a thorough rinsing and then washing and rinsing should be OK. If the fixer was in contact with a seasoned pan or the pan is made of or coated with a material that might react with the fixer, I would be very hesitant to continue to use it for food preparation. I personally would rather be on the safe side and not reuse the pan for food.
 
Safety data sheets for all the Ilford products are available here:
https://www.ilfordphoto.com/health-and-safety/safety-data-sheets/english-australian-msds/

In my practical experience, fixer washes quite easily off smooth surfaces - unless it has been allowed to dry, when it seems impossible to shift. However, it sticks rather well to textured surfaces like human skin and wood. So in a darkroom, hands can be a significant source of contamination. Smell is the best warning: you quickly learn to recognise the smell of fixer on your hands. For the same reason I've never understood why some people favour wooden tongs.

Next time dump it in a toilet or even better find a minilab that will take it.
As has been stated above, the dissolved silver kills aquatic organisms and microorganisms including those in septic tanks. If you only chuck an occasional developing tank full, the consequences will of course be trivial, but bear it in mind if you scale up.

When I was a kid venturing into photography, my only option was to develop films at the kitchen sink. My mother ruled the kitchen absolutely, so this was a major concession. When I had finished, she returned to her Empire and blitzed everything with a foul preparation called Jeyes Fluid, which was supposed to kill every microorganism known to man and otherwise. I could never persuade her that the JF was infinitely more of a concern.
 
  • Sirius Glass
  • Deleted
  • Reason: politics - although the hammer question is definitely interesting
  • grat
  • Deleted
  • Reason: politics - although the hammer question is definitely interesting
  • Sirius Glass
  • Deleted
  • Reason: politics - although the hammer question is definitely interesting
  • Marcelo Paniagua
  • Deleted
  • Reason: politics - although the hammer question is definitely interesting
  • Marcelo Paniagua
  • Deleted
  • Reason: politics - although the hammer question is definitely interesting
  • mshchem
  • Deleted
  • Reason: politics - although the hammer question is definitely interesting
  • Sirius Glass
  • Deleted
  • Reason: politics - although the hammer question is definitely interesting
Hmm, "don't ever cook with those pots again?"

Probably the safest bet is to just burn the house down. You can't be too careful!
 
If I posted "photochemicals can kill you" and "camera lenses are radioactive, you'll die!", you would quite rightly take exception (I hope). Both statements have elements of truth, but by no means do they encapsulate a whole truth,

Well the Thorium lenses problem does rear its ugly head now and again on Photrio and I'm still not sure we have a general consensus on that either.

In my late teens whenever one of our group of males made a limp joke we'd all point our luminous watch dials at his vital region as a sign of our discontent. For all I know those subject to this suffered with sterility later in life but I cannot find out as I have long since lost all contact with my mates of those days.

I never suffered that fate simply by making sure all my jokes were mirth making. You can't take any chances, can you?

pentaxuser
 
Hmm, "don't ever cook with those pots again?"

Probably the safest bet is to just burn the house down. You can't be too careful!

Oh yes, that would take care of it.