• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Kodak feature on Rochester TV re: Ektachrome

Prof_Pixel

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
1,915
Location
Penfield, NY
Format
35mm
http://13wham.com/news/top-stories/kodak-ektachrome-relaunch-is-job-security-for-rochester-employees

It includes the comment:"
Kodak will sell 10 million rolls of film this year, a far cry from its heyday of a billion rolls and the dawn of digital. Yet its once-core business has turned a key corner.

"Our film volumes have stabilized over the last two months," said Wayne Martin who is the Vice President of Film and Chemicals. "We have actually hired 50 to 60 people."

Eight hundreds people work to manufacture film at Kodak Park. There are hundreds of other support jobs."
 
Nice to see
 
Roger Cole said:
Who cares?

If it does the job it needs to do and they can support it, use whatever works. I don't are if they use abacuses.
Click to expand...

Agreed, as long as the overall process efficiency stays on the same level, why not.

Ontopic: good news again. Seems like Kodak sees a future for film sales. That's great to hear. More important: they created jobs.
 
This is the best news I've heard in a good long while.

As for the computers (did I see a DEC monitor there??), "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."
 
keenmaster486 said:
Those computer systems look like about, oh, I don't know, 1995 vintage.
Click to expand...
Those machines aren't there for playing games or surfing the web or watching Netflix.

As long as they keep working, they're good enough.
 

Professor, this is excellent news that makes me really happy. So the reintrouction of E6 film is a sure thing!!
 
The journalist who wrote that must have been born in digital era.
"Ektachrome was also known as slide film."
"Kodak is bringing back two Ektachrome products: 33mm film and Super 8 movie film."

A sign of the times...
 
Roger Cole said:
Who cares?

If it does the job it needs to do and they can support it, use whatever works. I don't care if they use abacuses.
Click to expand...
You'll care when they break and quality or production is impacted. Support costs for old hardware and software are high, and companies do put end dates on support contracts. This goes in the "risk" category.
 
Only 10 million rolls? That's the problem with business models and business in general. That's more than enough to sustain a business and I'm sure it's growing...besides film is only one part of their business now...
Kodak has a worldwide recognizable brand they should play on . And maybe do some social media
 
That's a great video. It's wonderful to see the ebullient looks on the employees. They must have been blown away when the news of this film coming back was announced internally.
 
They do have a nice social media presence now both for still and moving images. They even have a nice podcast I enjoy listening to. Kodak is back on the right track at last!
 
Lionel1972 said:
They do have a nice social media presence now both for still and moving images. They even have a nice podcast I enjoy listening to. Kodak is back on the right track at last!
Click to expand...
Agree. They're active on Facebook and regularly post company news and stories of general interest to the film community.
 
flavio81 said:
Those machines aren't there for playing games or surfing the web or watching Netflix.

As long as they keep working, they're good enough.
Click to expand...
Oh, I agree! In fact, I applaud it because I'm a retro computer enthusiast
I just think it's kind of funny.
 
Roger Cole said:
Who cares?

If it does the job it needs to do and they can support it, use whatever works. I don't care if they use abacuses.
Click to expand...
In addition, those old computers likely interface with the other equipment using legacy interfaces. I doubt that old manufacturing equipment has many USB, FireWire, or RJ5 connections.
 
keenmaster486 said:
Oh, I agree! In fact, I applaud it because I'm a retro computer enthusiast
I just think it's kind of funny.
Click to expand...

Me too... And thus you'll know that a 1979 computer can still work OK in year 2017. Things that fail are usually peripherals (i.e hard disks) and -rarely- power supplies.
 
You were looking at VGA monitors, not the computers. Did you notice a large flat screen in the background in one scene? The monitors are replaced as they fail but the computers are quite capable. I assure you.

PE
 

Let's think about the numbers. If they are selling 10 million rolls and (optimistically speaking) making $1 profit on each one, they are making $10 million per year. That's not exactly big money in the business world, but hopefully enough to keep them in business.
 
bvy said:
You'll care when they break and quality or production is impacted. Support costs for old hardware and software are high, and companies do put end dates on support contracts. This goes in the "risk" category.
Click to expand...

No, I won't.

These are PCs, not old VAX machines or mainframes. I deal with this kind of stuff all the time and it's super-simple in practice. Example - in my job we have to sometimes connect a console cable to a router console port. That needs an RS-232 port on the terminal (computer) but our computers don't have serial ports anymore. But we all have USB to serial port dongles - it's a non issue. Likewise DOS programs generally run fine under Windows, or in DOSbox, or come to that you can pick up an old computer on eBay for pocket change. It's just not really a problem with PCs like it is with old bigger machines.

And in any case, PE has said it's just the monitors that are old, because the software doesn't need any better display.
 
Gee if they were Macs you would not have as many compatibility issues. So much for the BS that Macs are too expensive.
 
Unfortunately for your conjectures, these are not PCs. Any PC would be merely a terminal for a much larger process control computer such as a Taylor, Siemens or Westinghouse. The PCs are used for process control in Research but not production.

PE
 
There is still a difference between real computers and PCs, even Mac are not in the realm of main frame computers.
 
There is still a difference between real computers and PCs, even Mac are not in the realm of main frame computers.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but nowadays, everything is done with a PC. There are very few REAL computers any longer. Even when it doesn't look like a PC, down at the metal, it's a PC.
 
Kodak Research owned a $50M IBM mainframe with a matrix processor. It ran some problems overnight. We had it linked to Forte and Irma boards on PCs to use PROFS and to graph results emulating 3278 and 3279 terminals. But for process control we used PCs in the labs and mid sized computers in the plant. However, they were not tiny either.

PE
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register