Kodak D-61a developer (1:3)

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,242
Messages
2,788,463
Members
99,841
Latest member
Neilnewby
Recent bookmarks
0

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
I was doing some test shots the other day to fix a focusing issue with a camera (Rapid Omega 100), and I decided to mix from scratch a litre batch of Kodak D-61a to process my HP5+ (6x7 120).

It's the kind of developer that nobody seems to care about these days, mainly because it's a classic middle-of-the-road MQ thing. Call me boring, but the simplicity of old MQ formulas has always appealed to me, because they guarantee that you won't need to hunt after exotic ingredients to mix a batch, and you're not dependent on a single manufacturer like proprietary formulas.

Using sodium carbonate mono as alkali, it's fairly active, and Kodak recommends using it 1:3 for tank development. They give times around 12 mins in the J-1 publication, but that's way too much. Instead of fussing about with development times, I inferred from Kodak literature that development times for D-61a are almost equal to, maybe a hair shorter, than DK-50. Since I experimented quite a lot with DK-50 1:1 on HP5+ until I found my sweet spot, I just used the same time (5:15, inversions every 30 secs) with D-61a 1:3.

I'm glad to report that the results are very encouraging, at least based on the negatives alone. It's sharp, not too contrasty, not too grainy, and the contrast is looking normal. Bear in mind that these are just digicam shots of the negatives on a light table, but from direct evidence I can see I'm really in the same ballpark as DK-50 1:1.

The other reason why I wanted to try it, is that it is a replenishable developer, even in its dilute form, like DK-50 1:1. The stock solution of these developers is way too active (I suppose older films reacted differently), but since I have maintained a DK-50 1:1 batch for almost a year now, I'm confident that D-61a 1:3 will be fun to maintain as well.

There is an equivalent formula from Agfa, developer 47, which is used stock, is replenishable, and ends up the same as D-61a 1:1. Only Kodak gives the formula for a 1:3 replenisher.

Kodak D-61a

Water, about 50° C (125° F) 500 milliliters
Metol 3.0 grams
Sodium Sulfite (Anhydrous) 90.0 grams
Sodium Bisulfite (Anhydrous) 2.0 grams
Hydroquinone 6.0 grams
Sodium Carbonate (Monohydrated) 14.0 grams
Potassium Bromide (Anhydrous) 2.0 grams
Cold water to make 1.0 liter

For tank use, dilute 1 part of stock solution with 3 parts of water.

Add stock solution (diluted 1:3) at intervals to maintain the volume, or use the replenisher, KODAK Replenisher D-61R, to maintain the strength of the tank solution.

Kodak replenisher D-61R

Stock Solution A

Water, about 50° C (125° F) 3.0 liters
Metol 6.0 grams
Sodium Sulfite (Anhydrous) 180.0 grams
Sodium Bisulfite (Anhydrous) 4.0 grams
Hydroquinone 12.0 grams
Potassium Bromide (Anhydrous) 3.0 grams
Cold water to make 6.0 liters

Stock Solution B

Sodium Carbonate (Monohydrated) 280.0 grams
Water to make 2.0 liters

To Use: Take 3 parts of Stock Solution A and 1 part of Stock Solution B, and add to the tank dilution of developer as needed. Do not mix Solutions A and B until you are ready to use them.
 

Attachments

  • _DSC0561.jpg
    _DSC0561.jpg
    432.1 KB · Views: 90
  • _DSC0562.jpg
    _DSC0562.jpg
    245.1 KB · Views: 91
  • _DSC0563.jpg
    _DSC0563.jpg
    462.9 KB · Views: 90

dynachrome

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
1,764
Format
35mm
Somewhere I think I have a few cans of that stuff, to go with my many cans of Polydol and DK-50. I would consider D-61a and DK-50 suitable for formats larger than 35mm. I have one quart can of D-76 with a 75 cents price tag. When I developed my first roll of film at home in 1971, the Kodak Fixer came in a cardboard box and had a price of 44 cents. The tank was a Yankee Clipper (the first one) with the agitator/
thermometer. While I have a large supply of film developer, I also have raw chemicals. I mostly use the measuring spoon method and find that adequate for the relatively simple formulas I mix up. Some day I will calibrate my Mettler P1000 scale and measure things the way I did in 9th Grade again.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,785
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
I was doing some test shots the other day to fix a focusing issue with a camera (Rapid Omega 100), and I decided to mix from scratch a litre batch of Kodak D-61a to process my HP5+ (6x7 120).

It's the kind of developer that nobody seems to care about these days, mainly because it's a classic middle-of-the-road MQ thing. Call me boring, but the simplicity of old MQ formulas has always appealed to me, because they guarantee that you won't need to hunt after exotic ingredients to mix a batch, and you're not dependent on a single manufacturer like proprietary formulas.

Using sodium carbonate mono as alkali, it's fairly active, and Kodak recommends using it 1:3 for tank development. They give times around 12 mins in the J-1 publication, but that's way too much. Instead of fussing about with development times, I inferred from Kodak literature that development times for D-61a are almost equal to, maybe a hair shorter, than DK-50. Since I experimented quite a lot with DK-50 1:1 on HP5+ until I found my sweet spot, I just used the same time (5:15, inversions every 30 secs) with D-61a 1:3.

I'm glad to report that the results are very encouraging, at least based on the negatives alone. It's sharp, not too contrasty, not too grainy, and the contrast is looking normal. Bear in mind that these are just digicam shots of the negatives on a light table, but from direct evidence I can see I'm really in the same ballpark as DK-50 1:1.

The other reason why I wanted to try it, is that it is a replenishable developer, even in its dilute form, like DK-50 1:1. The stock solution of these developers is way too active (I suppose older films reacted differently), but since I have maintained a DK-50 1:1 batch for almost a year now, I'm confident that D-61a 1:3 will be fun to maintain as well.

There is an equivalent formula from Agfa, developer 47, which is used stock, is replenishable, and ends up the same as D-61a 1:1. Only Kodak gives the formula for a 1:3 replenisher.

Kodak D-61a

Water, about 50° C (125° F) 500 milliliters
Metol 3.0 grams
Sodium Sulfite (Anhydrous) 90.0 grams
Sodium Bisulfite (Anhydrous) 2.0 grams
Hydroquinone 6.0 grams
Sodium Carbonate (Monohydrated) 14.0 grams
Potassium Bromide (Anhydrous) 2.0 grams
Cold water to make 1.0 liter

For tank use, dilute 1 part of stock solution with 3 parts of water.

Add stock solution (diluted 1:3) at intervals to maintain the volume, or use the replenisher, KODAK Replenisher D-61R, to maintain the strength of the tank solution.

Kodak replenisher D-61R

Stock Solution A

Water, about 50° C (125° F) 3.0 liters
Metol 6.0 grams
Sodium Sulfite (Anhydrous) 180.0 grams
Sodium Bisulfite (Anhydrous) 4.0 grams
Hydroquinone 12.0 grams
Potassium Bromide (Anhydrous) 3.0 grams
Cold water to make 6.0 liters

Stock Solution B

Sodium Carbonate (Monohydrated) 280.0 grams
Water to make 2.0 liters

To Use: Take 3 parts of Stock Solution A and 1 part of Stock Solution B, and add to the tank dilution of developer as needed. Do not mix Solutions A and B until you are ready to use them.

These look great.
 
OP
OP
Michel Hardy-Vallée

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
I printed the fence negative yesterday, and there's not much to add. This is a pretty normal negative, HP5+ printed on Kentmere RC in 8x10 at grade 1.5, looks as expected. Crappy repro shot from an iPod.

IMG_1439.jpeg
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
3,693
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
I printed the fence negative yesterday, and there's not much to add. This is a pretty normal negative, HP5+ printed on Kentmere RC in 8x10 at grade 1.5, looks as expected. Crappy repro shot from an iPod.

View attachment 341428
Looks very nice. What would you say are the advantages, if there are any, over DK50? I too, like some of the older film developers. DK50 is one of my favorites, but Agfa made some very good ones too. I like Agfa/Ansco 17M real well and prefer it to D-76. Of course we're talking mix-your-own-only and some folks just can't or won't mess with that.
 

lantau

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
826
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
A while ago I tried DK62a, I believe. It is essentially a more concentrated version of DK50. I was hoping to use it for Foma Retropan as a replacement for their special developer. But its activity didn't match the special developer.

With carbonate as its alkali I am wondering if this D61a would be better suited? Is its activity much higher than DK50?

The advantage for me is that I could mix single shots on demand rather then mixing a package of the Foma developer and then not using it all in time.
 
OP
OP
Michel Hardy-Vallée

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
Looks very nice. What would you say are the advantages, if there are any, over DK50? I too, like some of the older film developers. DK50 is one of my favorites, but Agfa made some very good ones too. I like Agfa/Ansco 17M real well and prefer it to D-76. Of course we're talking mix-your-own-only and some folks just can't or won't mess with that.

I have to say I'm still figuring this out. DK-50 gives a slightly upswept curve, so that you get very good highlight separation. The downside is that the toe is longer, up until the midtones. If you like the look of Tri-X 320 (TXP), you will like this.

From the look of it, I'm suspecting that D61a might give a more straight-line tone curve, but I'll have to measure it properly before saying so.

Both developers seem to have comparable sharpness and grain.
 
OP
OP
Michel Hardy-Vallée

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
A while ago I tried DK62a, I believe. It is essentially a more concentrated version of DK50. I was hoping to use it for Foma Retropan as a replacement for their special developer. But its activity didn't match the special developer.

With carbonate as its alkali I am wondering if this D61a would be better suited? Is its activity much higher than DK50?

The advantage for me is that I could mix single shots on demand rather then mixing a package of the Foma developer and then not using it all in time.

DK-60a is probably what you mean. It's got the same amount of MQ as DK-50, but it has more sulfite and more alkali. Based on the formula, DK-60a would be more active (more alkali) but maybe finer grain (more sulfite).

D61a stock is quite concentrated, that's why I'm using it at 1:3 ("tank" dilution), while I'm using DK-50 at 1:1 only.

I've used D-61a at 1:1 (the "tray" dilution) once, and the negatives were thick.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom