Kodak Concedes Difficulty in Drawing Lead Bidder for Patents

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
At one time, they took product specialists and sent them out for MBAs. These people then became some of the top managers. The problem was, that they started to promote MBAs who had only business admin backgrounds, or accountants. Carl Kohrt was one of the last to go from science to business, but they passed over him for a pure business type, Carp, and this was a recurring theme.

Now, Perez may be a product specialist, but not in photography, in printing. He did not know the photo business. Neither did Fischer.

Fischer new the phone business, so why did Kodak fail to get into that? Perez knew printing, so why did Kodak fail there? Interesting questions, eh?

PE
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
Yes, nothing wrong with having an MBA, per se. As has been stated here more than once, if you want to have a photography business, studying business will benefit you more than studying photography.

But imagine if you couldn't shoot Portra, because some bean-counter says buying dollar a roll cheap print film will do just as well. Not far-fetched- I've had essentially that happen in my former line of work.
 

dr5chrome

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2006
Messages
461
Format
Medium Format
..it's still not too late for KODAK. They can come back from the grave if they just get the corporate mind out of it. They need to do what ILFORD-PHOTO did. They can invest what $$ they have left [or someone can] and downsize all that monster-equipment they have, and make a smaller productive company. Problem is, I don't think they care to do it and George is turning over in his grave..
 

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
dr5chrome said:
..it's still not too late for KODAK. They can come back from the grave if they just get the corporate mind out of it. .
Click to expand...

How do we know that? Can a smaller Kodak support the massive legacy costs? Do they have enough cash to re-build the company into a smaller profitable one? Do they have a good enough core of employees anymore? Have all the good ones left by now?

How do we know that Kodak has not gone past the point of no return? Just merely surviving up until today is no guarantee.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Tonight, Kodak announced that they will be keeping some of the digital patents. A full decision is still delayed.

PE
 

pbromaghin

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
3,809
Location
Castle Rock, CO
Format
Multi Format

Well, we don't know that. We don't know how much the film division will be associated with the legacy costs. But a lot of those legacy costs might just go *poof*.

But that is what bankruptcy is all about, sticking it to those who trusted you the most - your unsecured creditors. That just might include a lot of long time, faithful, dedicated former employees.
 
OP
OP

Prof_Pixel

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
1,917
Location
Penfield, NY
Format
35mm
Ken Nadvornick said:
Yes. And look where it got them...
Click to expand...

The products I was thinking about: the RFS 2035 film scanner, the Premier Image Enhancement System, and the original DCS (later know as the DSC-100) all did quite well (note that the first two are hybrid equipment).

The upper level manager who supported them, and understood how the imaging market was changing, was replaced by a bean counter in about 1991 and the rest is history.
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,109
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,389
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
... for enough money. Kodak will make more money by retaining them than selling them.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,539
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
I'm keeping my wife for the same reason. Auction never reached the reserve value!
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,389
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
BrianShaw said:
I'm keeping my wife for the same reason. Auction never reached the reserve value!
Click to expand...

Funny, I traded mine in for a low maintenance, lower mileage, newer model who when I have a GAS attack tells me, "You have would your career to buy things for others and now is your time, if you want it and will enjoy it, go ahead and buy it."
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,539
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Ya, I contemplated trading... then I looked at my buddy's wife and decided I'd just keep what I have. Mine lets me buy whatever I want, mostly because she knows I need/want little. Once I wanted a Hassleblad and she let me have that. She twitched a little when I told her the price but never said anything except that she would not stand in front of it any more than she'll stand in front of any of my cameras. Maybe I did OK the first time around!

As far a Kodak is concerned... if they can't peddle the patents I sure hope they have a "plan B" ready!
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format

Brian C. Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2010
Messages
486
Location
Everett, WA
Format
Large Format
I've seen some reports that Kodak has made a deal for some of the digital patents for a bit over $500 million. Does anybody have more info?
 

PKM-25

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
1,980
Location
Enroute
Format
Multi Format

CGW

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Messages
2,896
Format
Medium Format

SkipA

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2002
Messages
596
Location
127.0.0.1
Format
Multi Format
General question here. What happens to the patent portfolio of a company that fails to reorganize and goes completely bankrupt?
 

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format

I thought it was stated somewhere that Kodak needed to gain at least 2 billion dollars from this auction to have any hope at all to pay back their creditors. What happens next if Kodak fails to raise the funds? Can the bankruptcy be extended?
 

Brian C. Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2010
Messages
486
Location
Everett, WA
Format
Large Format
I read that the Justice department might be interested in this single bloc of buyers, as it could be viewed as collusion. You can't have an auction with just one buyer.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
RattyMouse said:
I thought it was stated somewhere that Kodak needed to gain at least 2 billion dollars from this auction to have any hope at all to pay back their creditors. What happens next if Kodak fails to raise the funds? Can the bankruptcy be extended?
Click to expand...

You are correct. They needed $2B to pay off all debts. As of now, they either succeed or fail at raising that. If they don't raise it, then they try to pay their debts out of income (if any), or they fail at recovery and go into the next stage of the bankruptcy proceedings as defined by the court. That cutoff date is Feb. 2013.

PE
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,109
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
Brian C. Miller said:
You can't have an auction with just one buyer.
Click to expand...

Sure you can. Only one bidder will buy and you can also have an auction with just one bidder (or none).


Steve.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,539
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
... I just hope that single buyer is smart enough to not try outbidding himself.
 

zsas

Member
Joined
May 12, 2011
Messages
1,955
Location
Chicago, IL
Format
35mm RF
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…