Kodak asks Judge to cancel retiree medical benefits

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,454
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Interesting. In my employment we have been reminded several times in the past few years that we are "at will employees"... we have a job at the will of the management. Implied, no so subtley, is that we can be terminated for anything at any time.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Kodak, until recent years, was very paternalistic. You had a job with EK for life until the layoffs started in the 80s. Of course there were firings and layoffs, but these were minor compared to the big ones that started in 1988. And that was the first layoff to reach the Research Labs.

PE
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
7,528
Location
San Clemente, California
Format
Multi Format
Therein lies the key -- it's a privately held company that doesn't serve Wall Street. You're fortunate indeed. Were it publicly traded, regardless of the skill sets you've needed to learn, management would find a replacement for you (the "commodity") somewhere in the world. It wouldn't matter whether the person or persons hired could fill your shoes. By the time they ran everything you've built into the ground, management would have been promoted and/or moved on.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
7,528
Location
San Clemente, California
Format
Multi Format
It's likely that much of the change was attributable not only to Kodak changing, but to the Employee Retirement Security Act (ERISA) of 1974. See a history of ERISA here:


With respect to medical coverage, it was ERISA that primarily drove the many disclosures about plan termination possibility that started being made to employees of corporations.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…