mrcallow said:What Ed says and I'd add their c41 chems and the UC film line.
ann said:That film might be dead with the over 50's crowd, not so with the younger people.
mark said:Load of crap. All marketing hype BS. Tomorrow Kodak will announce they have discontinued themselves.
Well....SOmeone had to interject doom and gloom into a positive thread.
ann said:just to add to this news;
yesterday my dealer was telling me that in a news letter they received there was an article about the growing trend with the 17 to 25 age group and their growing interest in film. That film might be dead with the over 50's crowd, not so with the younger people.
Kino said:I know my 4 and 8 year old daughters are hooked! They saw their first picture come up in the soup today; their dog Sally!
"Cool" and "Neat" abounded. Next, oatmeal can pinholes and then their very own SLRs!
srs5694 said:This probably deserves another thread entirely, but I'd think an SLR might not be the best choice for children of that age, simply because most SLRs are so big and heavy. A small point-and-shoot camera might be better, or a compact ~1970s rangefinder (like a Canonet) for more control.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?