For what it's worth, I had over a thousand plus Kodachrome and Agfachrome slides that I wanted to make 4x6 color prints from so I bought an Epson scanner and Epson Photo printer in order to save money. They did an excellent job and I did save money. I also figured the prints would last far longer than trusting any computer "archived" endeavor. The quality of the prints were excellent. Better than most of the prints that I had ever had made from any slides. Had to quit after a thousand or so prints. Wife said we had run out of space for 4x6 prints. She was correct, as usual.......Regards!Silverfast claims to have a special Kodachome scanning mode. Are the results with Silverfast so much better than with VueScan, to make me want to spend more for Silverfast than for VueScan? I have at least twenty thousand (or more) 35 mm Kodachrome slides (before culling) to scan so Kodachrome scanning is a key issue for me.
If I managed to get an IT8 target for Kodachrome, would I get better results for Kodachrome scans using either scanning software? Or is the built-in support in Silverfast for Kodachrome good enough.
Phil Burton
Never have used VueScan so cannot compare. Had to scan over 200 Kodachrome using Silverfast for an artist friends book, and the scans were excellent, and they met his high levels of criteria. .
Arklatexian,For what it's worth, I had over a thousand plus Kodachrome and Agfachrome slides that I wanted to make 4x6 color prints from so I bought an Epson scanner and Epson Photo printer in order to save money. They did an excellent job and I did save money. I also figured the prints would last far longer than trusting any computer "archived" endeavor. The quality of the prints were excellent. Better than most of the prints that I had ever had made from any slides. Had to quit after a thousand or so prints. Wife said we had run out of space for 4x6 prints. She was correct, as usual.......Regards!
Matt,The biggest challenge with scanning Kodachrome is that the very thin nature of the emulsion layers results in the Kodachrome slides having a distinct physical relief. Many of the IR based dust removal systems have problems with that relief.
Oh yes defenitly!! It also worked very well on his ektachrome sides also that had faded, had a trick we learned on how to do that, would have to look up my work on those on how we overcame that. ;-)Do you remember if you used the Kodachrome settings with Silverfast?
Just as in E6 processes, the Kodachrome development process involves a bleach step which converts any silver in the film to a water soluble silver salt which is subsequently washed away. Developing Kodachrome removes all metallic silver. There is no silver remaining in a developed slide.1. Silver content. It is the silver in Kodachrome that foils the infra-red dust removal systems used by most scanners. I don't see how software can solve the physical reality of this problem.
With Vuescan, and the two different scanners I have used, dust removal doesn't work for Kodachrome slides - the resulting file is a mess.Matt,
Goooooood point. Thanks for pointing that out to me. Do you have any specific experience with Kodachrome dust removal with either Silverfast or Vuescan?
Phil
Perhaps I mispoke when I said "silver" when I should have said "silver halides"? But Kodachrome and b&w negatives neither one allows me to use the infra red dust removal tool of my film scanner, and the reason often given by various sites is that the problem is due to their silver based emulsions.Just as in E6 processes, the Kodachrome development process involves a bleach step which converts any silver in the film to a water soluble silver salt which is subsequently washed away. Developing Kodachrome removes all metallic silver. There is no silver remaining in a developed slide.
In contrast, the process for traditional black and white negatives do not use a bleach step, and as a result elemental silver remains in the negative.
Subject to one qualification, we can agree that infra-red dust removal tools don't work with black & white negatives or Kodachrome slides.Perhaps I mispoke when I said "silver" when I should have said "silver halides"? But Kodachrome and b&w negatives neither one allows me to use the infra red dust removal tool of my film scanner, and the reason often given by various sites is that the problem is due to their silver based emulsions.
Like this from a <SilverFast website> "Kodachrome slides are very challenging to scan due to the silver halides this film material is containing. Most scanner software produce blue casts and infrared dust and scratch removal always fails with Kodachromes. The Nikon CoolScan 9000ED, featuring an advanced version of Digital ICE®, was the only device capable of removing dust and scratches from Kodachromes … "
Or this from <ScanTips> "The Infrared channel does not work with B&W film because the silver content blocks all light equally (and infrared will want to remove anything it sees). Kodachrome slides are silver-based too, and processing sometimes leaves some of the silver in it, so it can become partially visible in infrared too."
And <this one> "Kodachrome film contains similar substances (for example silver) that are also contained in black and white films and are impermeable to an infrared ray. The ICE proceeding fails with such kinds of particles."
This may be another example of something that "everybody knows" not being factual? I don't understand the chemistries well enough to say if these statements are true or false. I will defer to your greater knowledge on this subject. I was only repeating something I had often read on the internet.
But I think we can agree that, for whatever reason, the infra-red dust removal tools provided by some scanners often does not work with black & white negatives or Kodachrome slides. Yes? No?
....Greater D-max. Many of my somewhat underexposed Kodachrome slides have faint details in the deep, dark shadows; details which can be seen when the slide is projected, but which my scanner cannot resolve......
....To be clear, I'm pretty sure the problem is a physical limitation of my scanner, and not the VueScan software....
Subject to one qualification, we can agree that infra-red dust removal tools don't work with black & white negatives or Kodachrome slides.
One of the people who posts regularly on Photrio believes that his version of Nikon (IIRC) scanning software does permit use of infra-red dust removal with Kodachrome, but I've never heard that from any other source.
I'm afraid those sources you have quoted misunderstand the reasons why ICE doesn't work with Kodachrome.
It is true that Infra-red dust removal doesn't work with traditional black and white negatives because of the silver retained in them.
However Infra-red dust removal doesn't work with Kodachrome slides for another reason - the thinness of the emulsion and the resulting physical relief of the surface of the slides. If you have never looked at a Kodachrome slide's surface carefully, you should. It isn't flat - the surface goes up and down in relation to the relative presence of the image forming colour dies. It is like one of those globes where the mountains and oceans are shown in both colour and in differing amounts of raised relief.
By the way, there are no silver halides left in a properly processed Kodachrome slide - if there were silver halides remaining in the Kodachrome slides after development, Kodachrome would have terrible keeping properties.
And that qualification I mentioned? Infra-red dust removal software does work with the chromogenic black and white films like Ilford XP-2 Super - the ones designed to be developed in colour chemistry. That is because the C41 process includes a bleach step that eventually results in all the silver being removed, leaving just dies.
FYI, Digital Ice works beautifully with traditional silver B&W film...with Nikon scanner. As you can see in one of my Media. Epson 600 reportedly has issues, but that's their cheapest...the more expensive models may suffer less from the junk factor.
If I managed to get an IT8 target for Kodachrome, would I get better results for Kodachrome scans using either scanning software? Or is the built-in support in Silverfast for Kodachrome good enough.
Phil Burton
JTK, Does your statement apply to all software used with the Nikon (5000 ?) scanner, or just to NikonScan?
Phil Burton
JTK,Phil, Vuescan seems to work as well as Nikonscan with Nikon's unique infared system. Nikonscan is an infared-based system, not just an application.
I'm currently using a fairly fast Win10 machine with Vuescan because there's no easy way to load Nikonscan with Win10. I'm in the process of firing up a fairly fast Win7 machine that I kept specifically to use with Nikonscan...but I don't expect any advantage...I'm as happy with Vuescan's front end as I was with Nikonscan, and I did try both of them when they both ran on Win 7 machines.
The only test that I'm aware of that distinguishes proper Digital Ice (which may not be properly implemented in the cheapest current Epson) can be seen with dust, scratches, and the way the scanner distinguishes between Kodachrome 12 and Kodachrome 14...12 and 14 were different emulsions...nothing like E6 films.
JTK,
Thanks for this reply. Since Kodachrome will be my main scanning application, this information about Vuescan is very important to me.
My oldest Kodachrome slides go back to around 1970, and K-14 was introduced in 1974.
Phil
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?