I think, they could, cause the main problem wil be the age fog, not the differences in coupler colors and stability.A second thought: Could K12 films be processed in K14? Were they mostly interchangeable (As in would there be decent results)?
I believe it is.Matt: Is photo #2 at Jericho beach?
1952 Kodachrome, ASA 10? My Sister, in my Uncle's corn, picked with his almost new, 1949 1 row corn picker. Pure magic. I've made high resolution scans, this stuff is as close to grainless as I have seen. Great time capsule. Having said this, I stopped using Kodachrome before it disappeared. I sure am glad my Dad kept all this organized. It took me several dozen hours to put these all in Carousel trays. Kodak, IMHO, were the only people that could process Kodachrome. When Kodak spun off their processing labs things went south. I always sent my Kodachrome to Kodak in Chicago.
I remember shooting Ektacolor-S in the '70s and sending it to Chicago for REAL Kodak processing. The prints were just perfect.
Looks to be Jericho Beach, or possibly Locarno. Absent any landmarks to go by, except a slice of North Van...Matt: Is photo #2 at Jericho beach?
Looks to be Jericho Beach, or possibly Locarno. Absent any landmarks to go by, except a slice of North Van...Matt: Is photo #2 at Jericho beach?
The films stayed in their envelopes all the way to the pre-splice room. As the Kodachrome was added to the large reel, each roll had attached to it one half of a numbered twin-tab, while the envelope received the other. The envelopes traveled with the films as they moved through the processing and mounting or being placed on the movie reel. Either a piece of the envelope with the full return address (in the case of the mailed films) or the envelope that the film came in (in the case of film from dealers) was used to return the film. In each case, the matching halves of the twin-tabs were together.With the volumes they did I always wondered how they kept the film matched up with the owner; especially with sheet Kodachrome, but they always seemed to. I've never heard of anyone getting the wrong film back from a Kodak plant in Canada.
...
Dad discovered a company selling an interesting, highly analogue "computer" response to the problem. It was a mechanical "matrix" that resulted in cards with holes punched in them. ...
Matt, over the years, I lost only one roll and no one could find any record of it entering the system after receipt. It just vanished.
We had a family friend who owned a wedding and portrait studio who lost all the shots from a wedding reception when he went out to the car afterwards, started unloading and organizing the exposed films by putting them in order on the car's bumper .....That's not a bad loss rate...
In 1984 I lost a whole slab of the professional version of Kodachrome 200 when, after purchasing it at the dealer, I absent-mindely sat it down on my bike's pannier rack, gloved up and pedalled off. Suffice to say 35km later at home, the expensive slab of red and yellow was nowhere to be seen...
As for sheet Kodachrome, I don't know - the North Vancouver lab didn't have machinery to process it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?