The drum light seal idea is intriguing, but would the fogging not be expected to be centered at the edge of the film gate rather than 6.5mm over? Or could it be occurring in the cocking step rather than during exposure? I may raise this issue with the technician. I made no effort to bag the camera between exposures, as I saw no a priori justification for doing so.
In that case, we are on to something, and the clockwork is not the primary problem at all. This camera was purchased as NOS and may have sat on a shelf for as long as 15 years before use, so seals could easily go bad. The fogging would occur primarily while the camera is at rest, and secondarily during cocking, and it would not consist of image-forming light (consistent with what is seen here.) It also explains why fast film shows the problem much worse than slower films. Thank you. I have alerted the technician to this issue (I took the camera in today.) With luck this problem can be solved.That 6.5mm is absolutely ok. It's in the place where it should be. You can see it here but from other side light seal. Cocking or during exposure? You figure it out by covering the opening and playing around with it. After thousands of rolls I never seen banding with 202. I only saw it a few times with older all metal Horizont.
View attachment 285652
Maybe it even was not the film transport, but the end stop of the swinging lens.It left the factory and it had some serious problems with uneven spacing between frames.
It somehow went away on its own after 4-5 rolls.
I think variation in lens panning speed is the most likely explanation here--but these were shot in the fast clockwork mode, and one would think that severe speed variations would be audible as irregular pitch, and I have been unable to hear any aberration, which is a bit surprising. Most of my shooting has been in fast mode--I have only used the slow mode a couple of times so far.
My Horizons and Wideluxes banded at the fastest speeds (as well as the others). You cannot hear it happen. It sounds the same as always.
Yes, you are right. Since Horizon 202, there are 2 speeds of the drum, slow and fast, then exposures are controlled by the width of the slit.But there is only one drum speed , maybe two, with swing lens cameras, but basically the shutter speed is controlled by the slit with.
Am I right?
Yep..I have the old metal HorizonT camera and it worked great on first shots....I then hit a few with that banding and it dawned on me, that I took those shots on the "unmarked" 250 shutter speed that is on the dial but unmarked.My Horizons and Wideluxes banded at the fastest speeds (as well as the others). You cannot hear it happen. It sounds the same as always.
Interestingly, I recently had a Horizon 202 which was perfect, then started to band after I let it sit for about a year. I noticed that if I exercised it i.e dry fired it for a bit, the banding was eliminated.
So these cameras do not like to sit unused for a while.
My old Lomo Perfekt (Horizon U500) did develop light leaks which were brighter, but it was a long time ago. Even if your camera does have light leaks, it definitely also has banding!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?