Kentmere Chemicals

Darkroom c1972

A
Darkroom c1972

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Tōrō

H
Tōrō

  • 4
  • 0
  • 32
Signs & fragments

A
Signs & fragments

  • 5
  • 0
  • 71
Summer corn, summer storm

D
Summer corn, summer storm

  • 2
  • 2
  • 64

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,823
Messages
2,781,433
Members
99,718
Latest member
nesunoio
Recent bookmarks
0

Jennifer

Member
Joined
May 23, 2004
Messages
61
Format
4x5 Format
Hi,
I just seen on Freestyle, Kentmere chemicals. They have some liquid fix, dev, HCA, stop. They even mention direct replacements for Kodak chemicals.
Intresting....


Jennifer
 

Uncle Bill

Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
1,395
Location
Oakville and
Format
Multi Format
Interesting. I wonder if it will show up on Canadian store shelves.
 

Michel Hardy-Vallée

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Apr 2, 2005
Messages
4,793
Location
Montréal, QC
Format
Multi Format
The funny thing is that one of their product is Kentmere Rapid Selenium Toner. In other words, KRST. Good thing we won't need to edit our language in the future...
 

Shawn Dougherty

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 22, 2004
Messages
4,129
Location
Pittsburgh
Format
Multi Format
The product descriptions actually state "Kentmere black & white processing chemicals have been developed with the same or similar formulations as Kodak chemicals for less!" Sounds good to me.

I'm going to take a look at thier Brown Toner and KRST. I like thier paper and I'd rather support them than Kodak at this point.
 

Nick Zentena

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
4,666
Location
Italia
Format
Multi Format
I think all the companies over time have made versions of D-72,D-76 and all the other popular Kodak formulas. Most of the Kodak formulas were standards.
 

psvensson

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2004
Messages
623
Location
Queens, NY
Format
Medium Format
Judging by the descriptions, these are eerily similar to Kodak chemicals. I wonder if maybe Kodak chemicals are made by a third party, and Freestyle has struck a deal with that manufacturer to private-label the products. They're not even listed on the Kentmere site, so it seems the mind behind this is Freestyle.
 

PHOTOTONE

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
2,412
Location
Van Buren, A
Format
Large Format
Judging by the descriptions, these are eerily similar to Kodak chemicals. I wonder if maybe Kodak chemicals are made by a third party, and Freestyle has struck a deal with that manufacturer to private-label the products. They're not even listed on the Kentmere site, so it seems the mind behind this is Freestyle.

Indeed you may be correct, as Kodak (some time back) sold its chemical production plant to another photo chemical manufacturer, and now they make all of Kodak's chemistry for them., so it would be a logical assumption to think that they could make almost identical chemicals under private label for others, particularly if the patents had expired.
 

kiku

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
131
Location
Moorpark, Ca
Format
Multi Format
Hi,
I just seen on Freestyle, Kentmere chemicals. They have some liquid fix, dev, HCA, stop. They even mention direct replacements for Kodak chemicals.
Intresting....
Jennifer

Hi Jennifer:
I just checked Freestyle's web site and the MSD sheets for the various "Kentmere" photo chemicals. They are manufactured here in the U.S.A. by Photo Systems, Inc. Photo Systems? Who are they? Can you say "Unicolor"?
Only speculation here, but Freestyle and Kentmere may have an agreement and the chemicals are mfg. here, marketed as Kentmere brand, ripping off and undercutting Kodak.

Cordially, Howard Tanger
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,263
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
ripping off and undercutting Kodak.

Cordially, Howard Tanger

How can manufacturing and marketing Photo-chemicals be "ripping off Kodak" ?

All manufacturers make similar products, D76 - ID-11 and an equivalent from scores of others, HC110 - Ilfotech HC, Kodak Rapid Selenium Toner - Harman Selenium Toner, the list is endless particularly when it comes to developers, & fixers.

Ian
 

CBG

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
889
Format
Multi Format
"ripping off Kodak"

It's pretty much like the endless chains of accusations in the computer industry -

If I remember correctly it went something like this - M$ft ripped off Apple. But Apple ripped off another research lab, but they had ripped off DARPA, who....

Please don't correct me if I have the particular details wrong - I have no intent to make this a this computer vs that computer thread, the point is that many of the processes and technologies that culminated in the toners, developers etc. we use today, got started in a million independent darkrooms and then were elaborated and perfected and made marketable, often by the several major players - Kodak, Agfa, Ilford, Fuji, or by one of the dozens of second tier platers like DuPont, Edwal, GAF......

Point is that Kodak entered the business after many basic concepts were already in use, so they and the rest have been the shared beneficiaries of toning, developers, fixation etc... I note that not to belittle the huge improvements Kodak made to the industry and science, but to say it's hard to "rip off" concepts like toning.

Best,

C
 

Jim Chinn

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
2,512
Location
Omaha, Nebra
Format
Multi Format
I don't care who makes what for whom. If there is another option out there for over the counter chemistry and it is competitive price wise then it's good for us.
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,683
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
The whole point to competition is to bring about lower prices and improve quality which is why patents are usally time limited. If another manufacture can make equalivant products at a lower cost good for me. Illford, Fuji, Ansco, Clayton, and many others made a D 76 or Dectol clone.
 

fotch

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2005
Messages
4,774
Location
SE WI- USA
Format
Multi Format
What no one can "rip off" from Kodak (only they can give it away) is their reputation, reliability, and the piece of mind the customer gets when buying their chemicals, film, etc. Thats worth something, for each buyer to decide.

Availability is also important and it use to be in favor of companies like Kodak. This has changed a lot.:sad:
 

Neanderman

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2004
Messages
565
Location
Ohio River Valley
Format
Large Format
CBG;513739 If I remember correctly it went something like this - M$ft ripped off Apple. But Apple ripped off <Xerox PARC> said:
That's pretty much it. :D
 

joneil

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
75
Format
4x5 Format
Back to Kentmere - if that's not off topic :smile: - I notice my local camera store here is now stock a decent supply of Kentmere papers. Apparently Kentmere has a new distributor in Canada, and it is so very nice to have a local camera store that is maybe a 5 minute drive away stocking Kentmere papers.

I haven't seen any Kentmere chemistry, but I plan to ask.

I am always on the lookout for a better paper developer. Any particular Kentmere paper developer people might reccomend?
thanks
 

joneil

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
75
Format
4x5 Format
Back to Kentmere - if that's not off topic :smile: - I notice my local camera store here is now stock a decent supply of Kentmere papers. Apparently Kentmere has a new distributor in Canada, and it is so very nice to have a local camera store that is maybe a 5 minute drive away stocking Kentmere papers.

I haven't seen any Kentmere chemistry, but I plan to ask.

I am always on the lookout for a better paper developer. Any particular Kentmere paper developer people might reccomend?
thanks
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom