Thanks Sal. I missed that piece of good-to-know info. I was mistakenly assuming current availability meant current production.
I do know from experience that the paper itself, although quite beautiful when processed in Ansco 130, was more difficult to work with than the regular Harman papers. Due to the only hours that ever seem available to me, my processing usually calls for leaving prints to still-water soak overnight. Harman papers seem to have no problem with this, even if it's not exactly the best practice.
But the Kentmere Bromide had huge problems with it. The emulsion would begin detaching and flaking off from the edges inward. To mitigate this I would routinely leave sufficient white borders that the damaged portions could be trimmed off when dry mounting at the end. That worked, but was a bit irritating.
Harman's standards of quality are so high that maybe this even contributed to the paper's demise?
Ken