- Joined
- Sep 16, 2006
- Messages
- 1,758
- Format
- 35mm
Mine too. Makes me wonder if it's going to be a lifelong joke.My wife jokes that I take the same pictures every year.
You know, at some point I would use my N80 with 35-80 AF, 50 AF or 28-105 AF, but N80 is not a fun camera for me. It's a camera that gets the job done, but definitely not the camera I enjoy using.
... My wife jokes that I take the same pictures every year.
Sounds like a good reason to go some place different for a change. You know, mix it up.My wife jokes that I take the same pictures every year. She's probably right but I still enjoy taking them and seeing the results later.
I am in Cape May for the week. Recently I have not been feeling 100%. In previous years I brought a lot more cameras and lenses, including medium format equipment. This year I decided to go for lighter stuff. I brought a Minolta X-9, a Minolta X-370, a 28-85 Minolta MD, a 50/3.5 MD Macro, a Vivitar Series 1 200mm f/3 and a Vivitar 28-50. I don't carry all of it at one time. Half of today I just carried the X-9 with the 50. My wife jokes that I take the same pictures every year. She's probably right but I still enjoy taking them and seeing the results later. Maybe next year I'll bring a pair of Canon F-1 cameras and some heavier lenses. If I knew where I put my Minolta 200/4 lenses I might have brought one of them instead but the Vivitar has closer focusing, which is handy for some subjects.
Its functionality strongly reaembles that of a digital camera. Which of course is not a bad thing on its own - it means the camera is pretty advanced, gets the job done no matter what and it's efficient in doing so. It's just my personal preference to complicate my life with manual advance/rewind, manual exposure and unsophisticated meterinf circuit.What makes a camera fun/enjoyable to use? What does the N80 lack for you?
Lately I've been mainly using Nikon FM with 35 mm PC lens, just for fun.
Apparently not when in the hands of certain photographersgets the job done no matter what
Maybe there was an error in translation!You can step in the same river over and over again. Heraclitus didn't know what a river was, apparently.
I'm sure it's not that bad, not at all. Low light photography is a tricky subjct. It's not your hands, it's the light meter of the camera that can easily be fooled by the light sources present within the frameApparently not when in the hands of certain photographers. I just developed a roll I shot at night and most frames are so underexposed you can only see a dot from a source light LOL I'm a little baffled, but I don't doubt I'm the cause of it.
My main camera/lens combo is an FM with a 35mm f/2.8 Ai lens.
But my lightest rig is an FG + 35mm Series E.
Maybe there was an error in translation
Are they getting any better? Later this year will be fifty years since I started driving. I no longer have the reflexes of a sixteen year old but I have a lot more experience. I have been taking pictures even longer. I didn't really start collecting until about 1989. The enjoyment I get from using and collecting cameras and lenses is still with me even if I don't have the same enthusiasm I did as a boy. Some of the pictures I take now are better than the ones I took more than half a century ago and some are not. I still think about Verchrome Pan, Panatomic X and Kodachrone II sometimes.
No, he just confused a river with the water that's in it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?