Made a trip into the desert southwest once. Had an ice chest in the trunk with about 20 lbs of ice in it. Not in the container used to normally hold the ice. In that I put 4x5 film holders loaded with Ektachrome. After a full day of desert travel, I opened the chest to get my films out only to find the ice had melted, the box holding the loaded filmholders had floated, turned over, and the holders were floating in the water. I tried to salvage what I could to no avail. Everything was ruined. The Moral of this story? Don't do what I did. Put the ice where it belongs with enough beer or cold drinks to keep it in its place and carry the film and holders somewhere else............Regards!
Film is very robust. Just think about all those feature films shot in hot deserts as well as documentaries made in both humid and dry hot conditions.
I just watched the commentary about making of Lawrence of Arabia and they actually had problems with heat. They got little blotches on the film that went away when they came up with a cooling solution for the cameras and they also kept all their film refrigerated.
I just watched the commentary about making of Lawrence of Arabia and they actually had problems with heat. They got little blotches on the film that went away when they came up with a cooling solution for the cameras and they also kept all their film refrigerated.
Of course southern Europe is not a desert and is hardly comparable but still, the heat can apparently have effect on the film. Well, at least it had that time.
Did they innovate cooling system or was it purchased?
LofA was most likely professional grade and from one uniform production run, uniformity from one reel to another is of utmost importance.
That's very interesting but I wonder how they determined that heat had cracked the emulsion at the time of shooting? When they performed those 8K scans the film was essentially 50 years old. Obviously they know better than I do, but could some of that cracking simply be because of the passing of time over the last half century? Just curious.They used 65mm film stock.
I found another note about the heat effects on the film stock used for Lawrence of Arabia.
"According to Grover Crisp, executive VP of restoration at Sony Pictures, the new 8K scan has such high resolution that when examined, showed a series of fine concentric lines in a pattern "reminiscent of a fingerprint" near the top of the frame. This was caused by the film emulsion melting and cracking in the desert heat during production." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawre...estoration,_Blu-ray_and_theatrical_re-release
They used 65mm film stock.
I found another note about the heat effects on the film stock used for Lawrence of Arabia.
"According to Grover Crisp, executive VP of restoration at Sony Pictures, the new 8K scan has such high resolution that when examined, showed a series of fine concentric lines in a pattern "reminiscent of a fingerprint" near the top of the frame. This was caused by the film emulsion melting and cracking in the desert heat during production." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawre...estoration,_Blu-ray_and_theatrical_re-release
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?