I think you already know the answer: try toned vandyke and see if you like the results (both in terms of final hue and tonality)...
FWIW, to me the answer is Vandyke - pretty much due similar reasons you've already stated. (Less complication, ease and simplicity...) Plus, I don't like Ferric Oxalate much; there are too few suppliers of it, whereas you can get Ammonium Ferric Citrate from many different suppliers... Also, AFC is used for many other processes such as Argyrotype, Trad. Cyanotype, whereas FO is only good for (in extra) develop-out pt/pd. Ect. ect...
Regards,
Loris.
P.S. An important distinction is that Vandyke is a print out process (different shadow tonalities / characteristics) and needs very strong negatives whereas Kallitype is a develop out process and doesn't need as strong negatives. Depending on your printer model / inks and digital negative making method, you may experience difficulties with Vandyke. But if it works, I'm sure it will work better; in my experience, with digital negatives (when they work), the larger is the ES of the process, the better are the results... (I mean in terms of richness and smoothness of tonality.)