- Joined
- Apr 7, 2005
- Messages
- 174
I'm not sure how the disodium version of EDTA is superior, other than it has 2 sodium versus 4 sodium. Using equimolar amounts of each substance should yield similar results.
The Ziatype process uses ferric ammonium oxalate instead of the traditional ferric oxalate. The fao version is much more water soluble than stand ferric oxalate, so it is generally much easier to clear Ziatypes when compared to traditional Pt/Pd methods. Since citric acid is considerably less expensive than di- or tetra-sodium EDTA we supply it with the Ziatype kits, and then pass the savings along to our customers.
The effect you notice when adding oxalic acid to the ferric oxalate mix has little to do with changing the pH of the coating solution. Oxalic acid has a symbiotic relationship with the ill-defined ferric oxalate. Long story short: adding oxalic acid converts ferric oxalate from a non-stoichiometric form to a stoichiometric form. The stoichiometric form is more soluble in water, thus easier to clear.
Thanks for reading.
The Ziatype process uses ferric ammonium oxalate instead of the traditional ferric oxalate. The fao version is much more water soluble than stand ferric oxalate, so it is generally much easier to clear Ziatypes when compared to traditional Pt/Pd methods. Since citric acid is considerably less expensive than di- or tetra-sodium EDTA we supply it with the Ziatype kits, and then pass the savings along to our customers.
The effect you notice when adding oxalic acid to the ferric oxalate mix has little to do with changing the pH of the coating solution. Oxalic acid has a symbiotic relationship with the ill-defined ferric oxalate. Long story short: adding oxalic acid converts ferric oxalate from a non-stoichiometric form to a stoichiometric form. The stoichiometric form is more soluble in water, thus easier to clear.
Thanks for reading.
Last edited by a moderator:
