KA: Kodachrome "just not practical to try to replicate in today's market."

Hydrangeas from the garden

A
Hydrangeas from the garden

  • 2
  • 2
  • 45
Field #6

D
Field #6

  • 5
  • 1
  • 62
Hosta

A
Hosta

  • 16
  • 9
  • 133
Water Orchids

A
Water Orchids

  • 5
  • 1
  • 75

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,914
Messages
2,766,794
Members
99,500
Latest member
Neilmark
Recent bookmarks
1

bvy

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
3,285
Location
Pittsburgh
Format
Multi Format
Apparently this concludes their investigation of "what it would take to bring it back" from last year. Hopefully it's the last word on the subject for a while.

Dead Link Removed
 
Last edited:

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,433
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
Not news. The conclusion was most likely written long before the question was asked. Not that the question hasn’t been asked a jillion Times before and will be asked again a jillion times unless film dies before that happens.

Or in summary: “It never ends”.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,227
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Apparently this concludes their investigation of "what it would take to bring it back" from last year. Hopefully it's the last word on the subject for a while.

Dead Link Removed

Don't count on it. Kodachrome revivalist posts/threads will continue here as long as PHOTRIO exists. After that, they'll show up elsewhere. :smile:

It never ends

The Kodachromeastas even write articles in newspapers, magazines and on the internet from the grave. They are the undead of photography.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,433
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
... but congratulations to Adriana for the success in producing click bait.
 

keenmaster486

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
626
Location
Atroxus
Format
Medium Format
They're more interested in bringing back things like P3200, apparently. There were better films than that to bring back which would mean instant market share for Kodak.

Kodak's business decisions are a mystery wrapped in an enigma, contained in a riddle, for sure.

But yes, I guarantee you that Kodak never gave even 10% of a single thought to bringing back Kodachrome. They wouldn't bring it back if the year 1957 came and bit them in the face.
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
Don't count on it. Kodachrome revivalist posts/threads will continue here as long as PHOTRIO exists. After that, they'll show up elsewhere. :smile:
Along with bigfoot, chemtrails, crop circles, the Second Coming,
Etc., there will be a symposium held on The Grassy Knoll.
 

Luckless

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
1,362
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
They're more interested in bringing back things like P3200, apparently. There were better films than that to bring back which would mean instant market share for Kodak.

Kodak's business decisions are a mystery wrapped in an enigma, contained in a riddle, for sure.

But yes, I guarantee you that Kodak never gave even 10% of a single thought to bringing back Kodachrome. They wouldn't bring it back if the year 1957 came and bit them in the face.

Which films would be better to bring back than P3200?

Which currently offered films would P3200 be likely to cannibalize out of existing Kodak sales, rather than going after sales currently handled by competitors?
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
Which films would be better to bring back than P3200?

Which currently offered films would P3200 be likely to cannibalize out of existing Kodak sales, rather than going after sales currently handled by competitors?
P3200 was a delight when it came out in the '80s, I used it with a prewar Contax, f:2 Sonnar, photgraphing bands in very dark bars, far better grain than TriX and two stops faster before the push. I think the veiling flare of the wide open Sonnar is what brought the shadows up... it was a great match, and now I have another Contax and P3200 ordered. :smile:
 

Svenedin

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
1,191
Location
Surrey, United Kingdom
Format
Med. Format RF
P3200 was a delight when it came out in the '80s, I used it with a prewar Contax, f:2 Sonnar, photgraphing bands in very dark bars, far better grain than TriX and two stops faster before the push. I think the veiling flare of the wide open Sonnar is what brought the shadows up... it was a great match, and now I have another Contax and P3200 ordered. :smile:

Yes Ilford Delta 3200 has been quietly doing exactly that in dark bars with pre-wars cameras or at least that's what I do with it.
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
Yes Ilford Delta 3200 has been quietly doing exactly that in dark bars with pre-wars cameras or at least that's what I do with it.
I've yet to try the Ilford, I'm a bit ashamed to say.
Perhaps I should get some D3200 and see, I've yet to use an Ilford film I did not like.
When P3200 came out, the only comparable speed Kodak film was Royal X Pan, I have some frozen; it came in 4x5, 120, and had grain to trip over - way worse than TriX (which I considered ei 250).
 

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
Yes Ilford Delta 3200 has been quietly doing exactly that in dark bars with pre-wars cameras or at least that's what I do with it.

Delta 3200 is an excellent film, one I shoot with reckless abandon if the need arises. The only deficiency that this film has is that it does not come in a yellow box.
 

Svenedin

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
1,191
Location
Surrey, United Kingdom
Format
Med. Format RF
I've yet to try the Ilford, I'm a bit ashamed to say.
Perhaps I should get some D3200 and see, I've yet to use an Ilford film I did not like.
When P3200 came out, the only comparable speed Kodak film was Royal X Pan, I have some frozen; it came in 4x5, 120, and had grain to trip over - way worse than TriX (which I considered ei 250).

I like Delta 3200 but it's not a general purpose film (obviously). It does very well in Ilfotech DD-X (I've never developed it in anything else). I usually push it 2 stops but I've never never tried 3 which Ilford say it can do ((25,000). It enables me to take available light photographs at night, indoors without flash. The main difficulty for me is focussing in poor light. It does have quite large grain and the resolution is not wonderful but these are situations where it's either this or nothing at all. Good fun IMHO.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/144059001@N05/31029263406/in/dateposted-public/
 
Last edited:

keenmaster486

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
626
Location
Atroxus
Format
Medium Format
Kodak's efforts also might be better put into saving themselves from a second bankruptcy than introducing new and risky films.

Do we get anything fundamentally new with P3200 or Ektachrome? Fuji and Ilford have very similar films that serve the same purpose. The number of people who will care about the difference between, for instance, P3200 and Delta 3200, or Provia and Ektachrome (though there is a difference, of course), is probably too small to do anything but fracture the market and hurt all the companies.

In other words, I'm not sure the market can support more films right now. Maybe sometime in the future - the film market is growing - but not currently.

The only way the film market is going to grow more than slightly is if it is fundamentally transformed.
 

Lachlan Young

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
4,850
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format
Kodak's efforts also might be better put into saving themselves from a second bankruptcy than introducing new and risky films.

Do we get anything fundamentally new with P3200 or Ektachrome? Fuji and Ilford have very similar films that serve the same purpose. The number of people who will care about the difference between, for instance, P3200 and Delta 3200, or Provia and Ektachrome (though there is a difference, of course), is probably too small to do anything but fracture the market and hurt all the companies.

In other words, I'm not sure the market can support more films right now. Maybe sometime in the future - the film market is growing - but not currently.

The only way the film market is going to grow more than slightly is if it is fundamentally transformed.

The short answer is that there seems to be a fair bit of evidence that Delta 3200 is Ilford's second biggest selling film in 135 & 120 (after HP5) at major retailers like B&H. If Kodak can scale the coating appropriately, then it's an obvious product to make, especially given that it has appeal to a range of professional users, especially in the wedding/ social markets. The one-roll-every-six-weeks crowd of noisy amateurs are not the intended market. Visually, it's quite different in look to Delta 3200 (different choices in engineering the characteristic curve shapes). Both are excellent, & the choice is good to have.
 
Last edited:

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,833
Format
Hybrid
Apparently this concludes their investigation of "what it would take to bring it back" from last year. Hopefully it's the last word on the subject for a while.

Dead Link Removed

all they need to adjust the cast of ektachrome from blue to cyan and they are golden
they can even have it processed regular e6 ( if those machines are not dissassembled as well )
==
its great that they retooled the emulsion for smaller batches. large batch sizes was not gonna be a good thing

now ...
they just need to keep riding the social media tweetstorm and >>>> ADVERTISE
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,243
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
They're more interested in bringing back things like P3200, apparently. There were better films than that to bring back which would mean instant market share for Kodak.

Kodak's business decisions are a mystery wrapped in an enigma, contained in a riddle, for sure.

But yes, I guarantee you that Kodak never gave even 10% of a single thought to bringing back Kodachrome. They wouldn't bring it back if the year 1957 came and bit them in the face.
I expect that their Kodachrome decision was founded more on the challenge of making processing available than it was on the challenge of making the film available.
Kodachrome was designed for high volume, motion picture style processing. P3200 is not.
Kodak Alaris also has to be mindful of the fact that the film market is a worldwide market, but it is also inconsistent. If you, in your market, don't see the value of P3200, it might just be that your market isn't the one that motivates Kodak Alaris' decisions.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2017
Messages
279
Location
Balearic Islands, Spain
Format
35mm
Not anything new really, i would be extremely happy for Kodachrome to come back but i don't either have false hopes for it to come back because i know it's unrealistic.
 

George Mann

Member
Joined
May 14, 2017
Messages
2,838
Location
Denver
Format
35mm
It is the same nonsensical answer as given by the Kodachrome haters here!

Only a fool would try to revive K14!
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Only a fool who has never processed it manually or maintained a seasoned machine process would say bring it back!

Kodachrome is a mess to coat and process.

PE
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,227
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Any we have a whole bunch of Kodachrome fools around here.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
It enables me to take available light photographs at night, indoors without flash. The main difficulty for me is focussing in poor light. It does have quite large grain and the resolution is not wonderful but these are situations where it's either this or nothing at all.
Use a lighted rangefinder.
( I know, there is not much off the shelves.)
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom