Wecome Kriskrisbfunk said:.. my instructor is very encouraging and believes in order to see and previsualize you have to have a solid base in film, and personally I don't see any other way after discovering the craft.
MattKing said:Don't discount the wedding and portarait stuff yet - it's amazing how the mundane rigour that is part of what they need, often blossoms into and co-exists with experiment and creativity (see Blansky, and Cheryl Jacobs and many others here and elsewhere).
Matt
philldresser said:Wecome Kris
Seems that you have an instructor with his head screwed on. This approach can be quite rare these days
Enjoy the site
Phill
df cardwell said:I think we should start thinking about a Maritime APUG bash.
Good point, i know it's often used as the bread and butter.. and at the PPOC many of the photographers stated they started out doing it to make a living, then made it into something they really enjoy. I see the potential for sure, but when I shoot portraits I generally self direct the portrait to the way I want it to look, the way I see the person, and not necessarily the way they expect/want it to look.. it's something I'll have to work at (understanding client needs) if I want to make a living out of it, i expect.
Cheryl Jacobs said:Not the way I see it.When I teach, I hammer away against the notion that the photographer is there to do what the client expects. Rather, I firmly believe in learning what you (the photographer) want to do and say, know your style, know how you want to work, and draw clients who will pay you to do just that. That's why I do portrait work, and it's what keeps clients coming back.
Oh..... and welcome. LOL.
- CJ
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?