Jupiter 8m on contax?

OP
OP

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,160
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
Yes it is in Kiev mount. I was not sure because the sonar for the contax is 50mm. And If this is 53mm, it should not couple with the rangefinder properly.
I did find another thread starting that the actual focal length of the sonar s is 53mm. So maybe that is the case.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,263
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
50 or 53mm will make no difference. The focusing helical is identical for Contax and Kiev. If it's a good example it should make great pictures. I use a Jupiter 9 (85mm f2) on my Contax IIa and it's outstanding. Unfortunately the Jupiter 12 (35mm) will not fit the post war Contax but it does fit the pre-war models. I had to buy a genuine West German Zeiss in that focal length, that was pricey.
 

BrianVS

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2017
Messages
278
Location
USA
Format
Digital
The Contax/Kiev "standard" is 52.4mm. Tolerance for the focal length of the Russian lenses was 1% during the mid-60s. Some of the Russian lenses require a little "fiddling with" and even some filing to get onto a Contax. The Helios-103 is a double-Gauss formula lens that is inexpensive and very good.

The J-8M is a simplified formula Sonnar, the triplet of the traditional Sonnar is collapsed into a doublet. I've seen a few good ones, several "okay" ones, some not-very-good ones..
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
My J8m made in 1959 has the triplet and performs well.
My understanding has always been that the "M" denoted click stops for the aperture.
My '83 H103 is just delightful, it cost $79 with a perfectly functioning (even the meter) K4 as a rear cap.
 

Dali

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2009
Messages
1,868
Location
Philadelphia
Format
Multi Format
Be careful with Helios-103 as they are not 100% compatible with Contax or Kiev. For instance, I had a 1957 Kiev IIa and I could not use the Helios-103 with it (of course, the J-8 was OK). Different tolerance maybe...?
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
Dali said:
Be careful with Helios-103 as they are not 100% compatible with Contax or Kiev. For instance, I had a 1957 Kiev IIa and I could not use the Helios-103 with it (of course, the J-8 was OK). Different tolerance maybe...?
Click to expand...
Yes, my 103 mounts stiffly on the '36 Contax, OK on the 69 Kiev, not at all (with any force I care to apply) on the 59 Kiev.i
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,263
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
Typical! My Helios 103 mounted and focused on my Contax IIa and '70s Kiev just fine. FSU Quality Control left a great deal to be desired.
 

BrianVS

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2017
Messages
278
Location
USA
Format
Digital
On the Helios-103: the tolerances were not as tight in later years, I found 83~85 to be not as well made as the earlier 81~82 lenses. The Menopta 53/1.8 is a re-branded Helios-103 made in the early 90s, seemed to be better- several years ago I bought 7 of them and changed the shim out (and modified the focal length on a couple) to work with Nikon S-Mount cameras. Tom A (we all miss him) used one that I modified.

On the "Stubborn" Helios-103: I filed down the mounting flanges ever so slightly to solve the problem on some, and bent them outwards for others that were slightly loose. I also used a Black Sharpie to blacken the aperture blades, which increased contrast and decreased flare. It made a big difference.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/90768661@N02/albums/72157658421389429/with/21540480102/
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…