Interesting. There appears to be a contradiction between the video and the article in terms of his U.S. citiizenship. The article claim that decades before 1940 he had been granted U.S. citizenship but the video claims that his assets were frozen as an alien after war broke out between the U.S. and Japan.
What are the facts here? Thanks
pentaxuser
Thanks for that. Does that mean that Japanese parents were interned but their offspring born in the U.S. and thus, presumably, U.S. citizens could enlist or were drafted into the armed forces? Was the status of the latter any different from say a Japanese- American born in the U. S. but in this case was born of a Japanese father and U.S. mother? Finally was the situation any different for a Japanese-American born in the U.S. but this time had a U.S. father and Japanese mother?Unfortunately, it's not a contradition. Japanese-Americans with citizenship were sent to internment camps and had their assets frozen during the war.
Thanks for that. Does that mean that Japanese parents were interned but their offspring born in the U.S. and thus, presumably, U.S. citizens could enlist or were drafted into the armed forces? Was the status of the latter any different from say a Japanese- American born in the U. S. but in this case was born of a Japanese father and U.S. mother? Finally was the situation any different for a Japanese-American born in the U.S. but this time had a U.S. father and Japanese mother?
Thanks
pentaxuser
Are you referring to the Japanese Americans? Most/all of them had to re-make their lives as they were forced to sell their belongings and shops that they owned. I know a number of children of parents who went to the "Internment" camps and the universal story is that the parents would not talk about the experience as they feel such shame.I wonder what most of them, went back to.?.......
Pardon me for asking, but.....are we talking about anybody else.?Are you referring to the Japanese Americans? .
Pardon me for asking, but.....are we talking about anybody else.?
I may have misunderstood what your law said but it would seem that even children of Japanese citizens were subject to internment and yet could enlist? There is a contradiction here surely. If you are subject to internment, presumably it was because you were, in time of war, considered to be at best a potential danger to the state in which you live or were born in. If that was the judgement being applied, how could you enlist? If you were a danger as a a civilian how could you not be a danger or even greater danger as an enlisted person?
pentaxuser
Thank you for that. So it would seem that the children of enlistment age could either opt for internment or enlistment. If they opted for enlistment were there any checks/tests applied to judge whether they were of "good intent" towards the U.S. which, if they failed, presumably meant that internment was the fallback decision?The Executive Order makes no sense and is probably unconstitutional, but during the time of war...
Not sure about interracial kids, but all Japanese-American, even the ones born here, were affected by the order.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?