Jobo 2509n 4x5, light leak or uneven development? HELP PLEASE!

From the Garden

D
From the Garden

  • 1
  • 0
  • 548
Kildare

A
Kildare

  • 7
  • 2
  • 951
Sonatas XII-26 (Homes)

A
Sonatas XII-26 (Homes)

  • 3
  • 2
  • 1K
Johnny Mills Shoal

H
Johnny Mills Shoal

  • 2
  • 1
  • 925
The Two Wisemen.jpg

H
The Two Wisemen.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 826

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,308
Messages
2,789,425
Members
99,863
Latest member
Amaraldo
Recent bookmarks
1

ufpd

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
5
Format
Medium Format
Hi!

I am new to the 4x5 world. I recently purchased my first camera and a used Jobo CPP2 processor.

I am using a 2509 tank with a 6 sheet spiral, 5 minutes pre soak, 300cc TMAX-RS 75 degrees 1:9 dilution for 8.5 minutes. Stop and fixer. Al using position 4 for the motor rotation.

In one of the first batches I developed an unexposed sheet by mistake and I found strange bands in it. I assumed it was the sheet was fogged when loading or unloading.

So I repeated the experience, 3 exposed sheets and one unexposed. This time I used the black accesories that came with the spiral. I thaught it can be a problem with chemistry distribution. The result was the same.

Repeated again, I loaded 2 brand new sheets from the box (Tmax100) This time I was completely sure there was no problem with loading or unloading since I skipped the holder, from the box to the tank. Same results.

Dead Link Removed

In this photo you can se the bands. Exagerated for viewing pourposes.
The two sheets are from diferent batches, and the pattern is ALWAYS the SAME

I discarded: film problems, loading and unloading problems.

I only can think of a light leak in the tank or uneven development. But the patters are SO alike I think it can only be a light leak.

I tried to find the same band pattern in exposed sheets but none of them have them as far as I can see.

Please help me!

Thanks in advance

Alejandro
 

MartinP

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
1,569
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
Was the film x-rayed in transit to you ? Possibly a normal exposure would swamp the banding, but it does look pretty strong.

Alternatively, what is the developer flow in your tank during rotation - like you say, it could be that although the exposed sheets would also look odd ?? I'm curious as I'm just about to start getting 'proper' with large format, after a gap of nearly twenty years (previously i worked in a lab and we used deep-tanks, perfect results).
 
OP
OP

ufpd

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
5
Format
Medium Format
Was the film x-rayed in transit to you ? Possibly a normal exposure would swamp the banding, but it does look pretty strong.

Alternatively, what is the developer flow in your tank during rotation - like you say, it could be that although the exposed sheets would also look odd ?? I'm curious as I'm just about to start getting 'proper' with large format, after a gap of nearly twenty years (previously i worked in a lab and we used deep-tanks, perfect results).

YES!

It could be the answer. I brought the box from USA to Argentina in my lugagge! The security people told me there are no problems up to ISO800.

I will buy a new box and tried again!

Thanks a lot!

Alejandro
 

canuhead

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2006
Messages
832
Location
Southern Ont
Format
Multi Format
Carry on or check in luggage ? I've never had an issue with passenger security scans, ie-4x5 Tri X getting five or six passes. Check in luggage however will fry film so to speak.
 

BobNewYork

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Messages
1,067
Location
Long Island,
Format
Medium Format
Looks exactly like checked luggage fogging to me - a clearly identifiable pattern. In 35mm I've seen a continuous "sine wave" fogging down the entire length of the film.

Bob H
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
28
Format
Large Format
Standards for x-ray exposure are probably set for 35mm film protected inside a metal canister. Sheet film, normally packaged in a cardboard box, and is probably more susceptible. 120 format roll film would be similar.

Signs in the airport also indicate the sensitivity of the film is a factor. I don't know whether its true or not but I've heard that the reason that Kodak didn't market its T-Max 3200 speed b&w film as a 120 roll film is that they thought it would be too vulnerable to cosmic radiation. Ilford came along later and didn't think it was such a big issue, and seems to have been proved largely right, unless they have different expiry dates on the 35mm and 120 Delta 3200?

Philip Jackson
 

paul_c5x4

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
1,942
Location
Ye Olde England
Format
Large Format
Signs in the airport also indicate the sensitivity of the film is a factor.

I found this document from Kodak regarding the affect of xray machines and baggage - http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/tib/tib5201.shtml

I believe you can insist on a hand check of film at airports in the USA. In Europe, it isn't so easy, so I pack a sacrificial roll of Delta 3200 and the Kodak document - When challenged, point to the film, warning sign, and printout.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom