A little long-winded… While an image is what you make of it, what I see is tempered by
1. I’ve worked for near 40-years on behalf of all, and on behalf of some of the bar-none wealthiest and absolute poorest of this country.
2. I’ve worked for a large govt agency and have seen the most abhorrent, and exemplary, of my co-workers, and as well have seen this in the public. Including the most vile by the public. I’ve taken people’s liberties away, I’ve seen what it does to help us and as well the cost on family.
3. Am of immigrants fled communism, I’m as pro-U.S. and Patriotic as any… served near 10 yrs active duty w the Army + reserve status after. Served in an active war zone during a big war, and wore green tabs while doing so. I’m not dumb about politics or politicians, nor about policy, and do put the shoe on the other foot, all the time.
4. I’m heavily invested in our manufacturing and do machining, and I’ve worked for a large U.S. steel company with many ups downs, a co. markedly in the news lately highlighted by today‘s politics.
5. Since little, I’ve been fascinated by degradation. Interested in breakdowns and wear and tear of mechanical parts, vehicles, and even something so odd as the wear of shoes.
6. I really like Raymond Chandler.
7. The photographer’s short life and sadly death. His father committed suicide, said from his participation in the WW2 Pacific theater and its later impact on him. The photographer apparently maintained a consistent vision in his work (that aesthetic interpretation is a little unusual imo) - so his is a steady and committed vision.
8. Reflections of personal crisis and observation of effect, cycles, and that inside all my family.
9. I’m ever an optimist - I still see hope and strength in the image. There’s a fragile delicacy to that.
So (my) life is sort of baked into my cake. To finally acquire one of a small edition, I went with my interpretation. Everyone’s i agree is different.
“Some compared him to… mystery writer Raymond Chandler for his ominous vision of Los Angeles.”
“Fee once explained his objective. “Anything that was being torn down and removed from our landscape was of interest to me, because I feel that is what is happening to us as individuals,” he said in a 1999 interview with the San Francisco Chronicle.”