I think it was available in 4x5" at one time and discontinued due to low sales, but at that time, the first tier companies were offering more B&W sheet film options (like Super-XX and Ektapan, and maybe APX 400--I don't recall whether it was available in sheet sizes), so maybe it's time to test the market again. Forte and Agfa are out of the way. The remaining ISO 400 sheet films are Fomapan 400, Tri-X, Neopan-400, T-Max 400, and HP5+.
I think Amund is right. I checked the megaperls shop, and they only advertise Acros (100) in sheet sizes.
Was delta 400 ever available in sheets? If not, I wonder why not. Perhaps, there is some technical reason similar to that for SFX200?
As promised I will discuss internally and let you know.
Simon.
In fact, IMHO, all films in sheet would be exellent !
Why ? Because on 35 mm size, digital is superior, ......
I completely respect this opinion (not hoping to create a debate), but I really think this depends on your criteria. In my opinion d* resolution and sharpness is really just a case of trompe-l'oeil. This is particularly noticeable on any large degree of enlargement. There are no doubt admirable qualities for both. However, it sometimes pains me to think that some would not use 35mm film on the basis of resolution or sharpness....Why ? Because on 35 mm size, digital is superior...
Hi Guys !
Have a look here :
http://www.galerie-photo.com/zeiss-super-ikonta-canon-350d.html
Text is in French, but it is quite interesting .... And images speak for themselves !
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?