ISO 100 film Photos of starry skies?

Forum statistics

Threads
198,325
Messages
2,773,045
Members
99,593
Latest member
StephenWu
Recent bookmarks
0

trondsi

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
454
Format
35mm
I have a lot of iso 100 film (slide and Ilford B&W) in 35mm, medium format, and large format. My equipment is fairly basic though (Crown Graphic with only a “normal” lens. Rolleiflex etc). I am going to Death Valley where the starry skies tend to be amazing. Any tips on how to capture this? Should I run to the store to get faster film?
 

Ces1um

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2015
Messages
1,410
Location
Nova Scotia, Canada
Format
Multi Format
I'd download a film reciprocity app and learn how to use it, along with an external light meter. Otherwise you could use the looney f11 rule if you wanted to wing it a bit. Will you be including surrounding scenery or just the sky?
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,870
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
I've shot starry skies (star trails) on 100 and 400 film. I didn't care about reciprocity. Just set the aperture and open the shutter. Leave for several hours. What you have to worry more about is condensation on the lens. That has ruined a few shots.
 

Ces1um

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2015
Messages
1,410
Location
Nova Scotia, Canada
Format
Multi Format
I've shot starry skies (star trails) on 100 and 400 film. I didn't care about reciprocity. Just set the aperture and open the shutter. Leave for several hours. What you have to worry more about is condensation on the lens. That has ruined a few shots.

Absolutely right. I've just let the shutter stay open for hours when doing star trails. The op didn't specify star trails though so I wasn't sure if this was applicable to them or not. Might just be shooting a starry sky, or a starry sky with foreground interest. Or maybe star trails. Maybe even taking images of the milky way (which would be a longer exposure for sure). All of these would require different exposure needs.
Condensation could be an issue but I'm thinking Death Valley isn't really known for it's humidity levels. This time of year google says it's only around 14%.
 

4season

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
1,942
Format
Plastic Cameras
You might try Delta 3200 + fast lens, but unless you plan to mount the camera on some sort of tracking device, or wish to depict star trails rather than pinpoints of light, your exposure times are going to be limited to ~20 seconds or less (with normal lens). Nebulae and galaxies can be seen readily under dark-sky conditions, but they're actually quite faint and challenging to photograph using film.
 

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,870
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
Absolutely right. I've just let the shutter stay open for hours when doing star trails. The op didn't specify star trails though so I wasn't sure if this was applicable to them or not. Might just be shooting a starry sky, or a starry sky with foreground interest. Or maybe star trails. Maybe even taking images of the milky way (which would be a longer exposure for sure). All of these would require different exposure needs.
Condensation could be an issue but I'm thinking Death Valley isn't really known for it's humidity levels. This time of year google says it's only around 14%.


I completely forgot about low RH there! I was there in March a few years ago, and it was quite dry then.
 
OP
OP

trondsi

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
454
Format
35mm
Hi again!
Star trails were not really what I had in mind. Not sure if I want to include foreground landscape. Thanks for all the input folks, I was just wondering if it was possible at all.
 

Ces1um

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2015
Messages
1,410
Location
Nova Scotia, Canada
Format
Multi Format
Hi again!
Star trails were not really what I had in mind. Not sure if I want to include foreground landscape. Thanks for all the input folks, I was just wondering if it was possible at all.
It's totally possible. If you just want a quick photo of just the stars just follow that looney 11 rule and you'll get something. If you include foreground interest though that part likely will be underexposed and proper metering will be required for that subject, and likely you'll need to account for film reciprocity.

If you have a digital camera you could experiment first with it and then try with film using similar settings and adding a bit of time.
 
OP
OP

trondsi

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
454
Format
35mm
My second try at capturing starry skies; with the comet Neowise a few weeks back. I tried using Portra 400 instead (on my Rolleiflex), with much better results. I believe this exposure was about 10 seconds

118360385_10104743801375947_4963293135622769963_o.jpg


118597474_10104743801545607_8772560518155571969_o.jpg
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,788
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Given it is the night sky and that foreground objects are static I wonder what advantages D3200 gives. Shorter exposures do not confer any advantages, do they? The colour in the ones shown look good

pentaxuser
 

glbeas

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2002
Messages
3,918
Location
Marietta, Ga. USA
Format
Multi Format
If you had a star tracker to mount the camera on a film with low reciprocity failure will often do a much better job than a high speed film with more failure. Acros comes to mind as it can do long exposures easily. Hypersensitizing film was a technique using a dry gas infusion on the film emulsion that drastically improved reciprocity characteristics of the film.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom