Is there an optimum in contrast for the carbon process?

Sonatas XII-52 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-52 (Life)

  • 0
  • 1
  • 529
Helton Nature Park

A
Helton Nature Park

  • 0
  • 0
  • 844
See-King attention

D
See-King attention

  • 3
  • 0
  • 1K
Saturday, in the park

A
Saturday, in the park

  • 1
  • 0
  • 2K
Farm to Market 1303

A
Farm to Market 1303

  • 1
  • 0
  • 2K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,762
Messages
2,796,231
Members
100,027
Latest member
PixelAlice
Recent bookmarks
0

mcilroy

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2010
Messages
52
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Let's assume you didn't work with any other processes than carbon transfer, so your negatives would be exposed and developed for that purpose exclusively.
Now, IF something like an optimum in contrast for a carbon tissue existed, what would it be? In other words, if I would contact print a 21 step wedge to that tissue, how many steps would I count from Dmax to paper white?

To put it another way: Are there disadvantages to matching the tissue contrast to a given negative, rather than matching the negative to the process?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom