- Joined
- Sep 16, 2006
- Messages
- 1,757
- Format
- 35mm
I enjoyed reading your story about your Spottie. I once had two Spotties. If it were not for the radioactive lenses in the Takumar lineup--especially the beautiful and indispensable 50/1.4--then I would have held onto my Pentax gear. I do not believe the 55/1.8 you mention is thoriated. I have considered going back...I do like having a winder or motor, though...
One of the more interesting jobs I have had was working in a freezer at 26ºC in downtown Melbourne in the late sixties. The job entailed shredding frozen calf and pig pancreas organs for the manufacture of Insulin.
I shared digs with a fella who was travelling down to Antarctica as a photographer and Morse code operator. Radio was bad during a blizzard and quite a few messages travelled via Morse code in those days
Anyway he was wondering about the effectiveness of winterising his cameras, which were three Nikon F bodies and three lenses, 35, 55 and 105 Nikkors. The three bodies and three lenses were so he didnt have to change lenses in very bad weather and also so that at any time there could be three people using the cameras.
The upshot was that we convinced the Government body running my section to allow the government body running the Antarctic division, to use our cold rooms for tests.
We dropped the temperature 33ºC, which I think was the coldest we could get. You have to understand these were quite large workrooms with machinery for cutting and shredding inside.
The cameras that were winterised, which meant that they were cleaned and all lubricant removed and a couple of others that were literally straight off the shelf from the Nikon importer, were left inside for ½ a day to really cool down.
A special shutter-testing set-up had been arranged with the shutter tester on the outside and the cameras on the inside with a very thick piece of glass in-between.
From memory the winterised cameras worked perfectly, the normal cameras were not that far behind, maybe ¼ to ½ a stop at most slower. Manageable, but a difference nonetheless.
I know that one of those cameras worked in temperatures around 60ºC as pictures were taken in a blizzard of some penguins. The penguin pictures were of quite interesting scientific value at the time, as very little was known how they survived down there.
I dont know how long after coming back to Australia before the cameras were re-lubed, but I know one of them is still in use by my friend to this day in a working capacity.
For the Australian members, this was at CSIRO in Parkville.
Mick.
I appreciate the responses.
I should have kept my F3HP.
How might the Olympus OM-2N fare in cold weather? My OM-2N is scheduled to arrive today. I am trying to discern whether or not it may be better to exchange the OM-2N for an F3HP. Both of these camera seem to have a nice following. Which will serve me faithfully in the cold?
Then we are left with the question; What do we mean by "cold"? Alaska cold or Florida cold?
Cold as a well diggers ass in February!
Over the years, lubes dry up and become thicker, cold only makes that worse.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?