Is the Sony Nex 5n still good in 2019?

Machinery

A
Machinery

  • 6
  • 3
  • 72
Cafe art.

A
Cafe art.

  • 1
  • 7
  • 89
Sheriff

A
Sheriff

  • 0
  • 0
  • 68
WWPPD2025-01-scaled.jpg

A
WWPPD2025-01-scaled.jpg

  • 3
  • 2
  • 107

Forum statistics

Threads
198,096
Messages
2,769,531
Members
99,561
Latest member
jjjovannidarkroom
Recent bookmarks
1

Hood

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2018
Messages
11
Location
Perth, Australia
Format
35mm
Is the Sony Nex 5n still good in 2019?

I recently went back a revisited my old Sony Nex 5n recently after years of not using it since getting my a7's.
It was a fun little excursion with an old friend and I have shared a bit of a story and some images with a manual focus lens if anyone is interested in having a look.
56879353_306431393357522_6543723171873292288_n.jpg

http://joshpereraphoto.metalforfishes.com/?p=3122

Does anybody here still use what would technically be considered an older camera? Or have you recently gone back to one?
 

Billy Axeman

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Messages
523
Location
Netherlands
Format
Digital
I'm still using a Pentax K5-II as my main digital camera (2012), which is technically outdated but perfectly usable. I got a (new) 2-nd body and a battery-grip (for AA's) as backups when this model was discontinued and cheap. The body kit also contained an extra battery and a battery-charger. So, now I have two identical kits with enough redundancy and hope to run them an extra 10 years, but I'm not expecting to use them as long as my film-camera's because they can't be CLA'd.
 

jgoody

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
266
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Multi Format
When I go digital I still use a Sony Nex 7 - unless I want to upgrade to a full frame I don't see that the newer APS Cs offer me much more in image quality. Still like film best.
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
I'm still using DSLR from 2008 and its original battery. It was good enough to win prizes and get published.
Don't know why can't be good by now. I have modern lens attached to it.
 

Wallendo

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
1,409
Location
North Carolina
Format
35mm
For most purposes, an old digital camera is just as good as the newest model. Most monitors can only display 2 megapixels of 8(24) bit information. 10 megapixels is really all that is needed for all but the largest prints.

I am still using my NEX-5n and Sony a65. Newer cameras have more bells and whistles and higher ISO sensitivity as well as excessive pixels, but I have never seen any reason to upgrade. If I need really high resolution, and I rarely do, I will just shoot medium format film.
 

Luckless

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
1,362
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
If it could be used to take good photos in the year it was new, and it is still working, then logic suggests that it can still be used to take good photos today...

Old cameras won't be as flexible as newer models frequently are, and often can't be pushed as far, or be as forgiving in use, but they're still perfectly useful devices if you're willing to put in the work to use them to their best ability.

The existence of a newer camera than an older model doesn't make the old model bad, it merely makes it not as good. [Assuming the newer camera is actually better, and not a cheap cut down design...]
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,376
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Most of the improvements in digital cameras relate to the capability of the image processor and the firmware. And there has been a lot of those improvements in recent years.
However, if your results from your older camera meet your needs, why change?
 

Billy Axeman

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2017
Messages
523
Location
Netherlands
Format
Digital
Are we now discovering a seldom addressed reason for the rapid decline of the digital camera market?
Perhaps we should buy a new camera now, before we are confronted with a reduced choice and much higher prices.:wink:
 

1kgcoffee

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
500
Location
Calgary
Format
Medium Format
I will never buy a new digital body again. Old body a few years out maybe. My Nex-3 still produces wonderful digital files, if that's what I'm after. My Canon 700d with magic lantern can do great HDR panos.

Yes, newer sensors have better dynamic range, IBIS, resolution, but with good technique it's not needed. I prefer shooting film in any case.

I would say the nex-5 is perfectly suitable. Don't buy into the consumer mindset let others waste their money on depreciation and buy from them at a discount when they need the new thing.
 

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,203
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
It is not a "New Topic" but this picture taker addresses the very thing you guys are discussing.


 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,750
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
Is it still good? Does it work any less now than when it was new? If not then it's still good. If it is malfunction in some way then it's not good.
 
OP
OP
Hood

Hood

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2018
Messages
11
Location
Perth, Australia
Format
35mm
I'm still using a Pentax K5-II as my main digital camera (2012), which is technically outdated but perfectly usable. I got a (new) 2-nd body and a battery-grip (for AA's) as backups when this model was discontinued and cheap. The body kit also contained an extra battery and a battery-charger. So, now I have two identical kits with enough redundancy and hope to run them an extra 10 years, but I'm not expecting to use them as long as my film-camera's because they can't be CLA'd.
Yes, they will never run as long as all our beloved film cameras, but they do certainly maintain their usefulness long after what seems to be the mass consensus of obsolescence... if internet discussion, reviews and the slew of latest gear is in fact to be believed. :wink:
Sony a850.
A850 is still a great camera I imagine. :smile:
Every once in awhile I pull out my old 6mp Nikon D70s. The files at bases ISO are so silky and juicy. I love it.
That is the biggest thing I find. You can get a really different rendering from these older digi's over the latest greatest. It offers a creative option that you usually only got with film and using different emulsions.
When I go digital I still use a Sony Nex 7 - unless I want to upgrade to a full frame I don't see that the newer APS Cs offer me much more in image quality. Still like film best.
I always wanted a nex 7, however the a7 series dropped before I pulled the pin on one, so of course went down that route instead.
I love film, the only problem I have had since becoming a father is time to get the results I desire, thus my digis are getting more and more of a workout I am afraid.
If it still functions, and you can get images off of it from your memory cards, and have reasonable expectations for what it can do, then yes. If you're expecting it to produce 40mp noiseless JPEGs at ISO 25600, then no.
This is very true. It is often a tail of expectations.
I'm still using DSLR from 2008 and its original battery. It was good enough to win prizes and get published.
Don't know why can't be good by now. I have modern lens attached to it.
That's the thing, if you are still happy with the output and how it functions, if it still inspires you to pull it out and make images, then it is still a fine camera.
For most purposes, an old digital camera is just as good as the newest model. Most monitors can only display 2 megapixels of 8(24) bit information. 10 megapixels is really all that is needed for all but the largest prints.

I am still using my NEX-5n and Sony a65. Newer cameras have more bells and whistles and higher ISO sensitivity as well as excessive pixels, but I have never seen any reason to upgrade. If I need really high resolution, and I rarely do, I will just shoot medium format film.
It's a very good point. That medium format film look is also desirable, that is for sure. Not many digi's will out resolve a good 6x9 negative.
If it could be used to take good photos in the year it was new, and it is still working, then logic suggests that it can still be used to take good photos today...

Old cameras won't be as flexible as newer models frequently are, and often can't be pushed as far, or be as forgiving in use, but they're still perfectly useful devices if you're willing to put in the work to use them to their best ability.

The existence of a newer camera than an older model doesn't make the old model bad, it merely makes it not as good. [Assuming the newer camera is actually better, and not a cheap cut down design...]
That is exactly my thoughts too.
Most of the improvements in digital cameras relate to the capability of the image processor and the firmware. And there has been a lot of those improvements in recent years.
However, if your results from your older camera meet your needs, why change?
This is true. I find though that a base iso's most the older cameras are still great and often have unique rendering to todays sensors. It's at the higher ISO end of the spectrum that the newer models surpass the older as far as image quality is concerned I believe.
Are we now discovering a seldom addressed reason for the rapid decline of the digital camera market?
Perhaps we should buy a new camera now, before we are confronted with a reduced choice and much higher prices.:wink:
Haha, it's a valid point. A huge part of the decline over recent years could be the constant slew of new models that really only improve over that last y about %10 or so. I think there are perhaps more and more of us holding on to older gear for longer as the pricing of new lenses and models seems to increase also. Thus creative a bit of a knock on loop. It does however feel like we a re going through a bit of a camera and lens boom much like that of the '60s and 70's and thus why you see so many of those camera and lens models still doing the circulation.
I will never buy a new digital body again. Old body a few years out maybe. My Nex-3 still produces wonderful digital files, if that's what I'm after. My Canon 700d with magic lantern can do great HDR panos.

Yes, newer sensors have better dynamic range, IBIS, resolution, but with good technique it's not needed. I prefer shooting film in any case.

I would say the nex-5 is perfectly suitable. Don't buy into the consumer mindset let others waste their money on depreciation and buy from them at a discount when they need the new thing.
I am starting to realise this myself. It's nice to have a new camera. And get the new box and the whole experience. But often you can get gear that is literally only a year or two old for a fraction of the original retail price...dependent on brand of course. Certain brands definitely hold their value longer it seems.
It is not a "New Topic" but this picture taker addresses the very thing you guys are discussing.



My article isn't so much a review as a photo story about my week return to an old camera, and my thoughts on whether it is still a worthy camera to be carrying around in 2019. :smile:

Is it still good? Does it work any less now than when it was new? If not then it's still good. If it is malfunction in some way then it's not good.
That is very true. I like to talk about these types of topics as often there is appreciation to be had for some of the slightly older gear that still functions perfectly well. It has a charm all of it's own. :smile:
 

CMoore

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 23, 2015
Messages
6,203
Location
USA CA
Format
35mm
My article isn't so much a review as a photo story about my week return to an old camera, and my thoughts on whether it is still a worthy camera to be carrying around in 2019. :smile:
The linked videos is not so much about "Reviews" as why the "Best" or "Latest" piece of gear is not necessarily so great. Your 20 Meg Pix camera might be 100% Awesome for shooting models, for Vogue, in a studio, for pictures that will be no bigger than a 8x10 magazine.
Your 5 year old Eye/Auto focus might be 100% Awesome for the same task.
You probably did not watch the video. His point was that "Professional Photographers" rarely use the newest gear available.
That was the main point of his video and why he thinks reviews are often pointless. :unsure:
 
OP
OP
Hood

Hood

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2018
Messages
11
Location
Perth, Australia
Format
35mm
The linked videos is not so much about "Reviews" as why the "Best" or "Latest" piece of gear is not necessarily so great. Your 20 Meg Pix camera might be 100% Awesome for shooting models, for Vogue, in a studio, for pictures that will be no bigger than a 8x10 magazine.
Your 5 year old Eye/Auto focus might be 100% Awesome for the same task.
You probably did not watch the video. His point was that "Professional Photographers" rarely use the newest gear available.
That was the main point of his video and why he thinks reviews are often pointless. :unsure:

I'm currently at work with a respirator on and all the rest of the PPE that goes with my trade, so I only quickly perused the video to get the gist of it and did not in fact watch it all.
I agree that many professionals use older gear if it still performs the task required perfectly well, however I disagree that gear reviews are useless/pointless. I love to read gear reviews just to keep abreast of current technological achievements or even to ponder some piece of gear that may interest me. Especially old manual film lenses or old film cameras etc. Someones opinion on how something performs or even just their experience in general I find quite valuable and interesting to read.
But each to their own I guess... :smile:
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
Camera inspires to take images.... I'm not sure. My family purchased it because we needed less hasle than film and better than digital p&s camera. I don't think it inspired me, but with this camera I learned photography by simply taking as many pictures as I needed and how I needed.
 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,750
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
In my opinion the Sony NEX 5 isn't good enough for me back when it was introduced. But to each his own and if it was good enough for you then I can't see why it's not good now.
 
OP
OP
Hood

Hood

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2018
Messages
11
Location
Perth, Australia
Format
35mm
Camera inspires to take images.... I'm not sure. My family purchased it because we needed less hasle than film and better than digital p&s camera. I don't think it inspired me, but with this camera I learned photography by simply taking as many pictures as I needed and how I needed.
I think a camera can if it is un obtrusive, easy to carry and therefore there ready to capture life's fleeting moments. For example by contrast I started a revisit of my old pentax k30 just after this in much the same manner. However I have not gelled with it in the same way. It has not inspired me to go and make images with it. So I think a camera in that way can help inspire you.

In my opinion the Sony NEX 5 isn't good enough for me back when it was introduced. But to each his own and if it was good enough for you then I can't see why it's not good now.

Oh I still was eager to upgrade, and did. But as a carry around everywhere snapshot camera that is un obtrusive yet can give quality results, in this way it is still a worthy friend I feel. For work I will always choose my a7 or A7r.
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
Where is Rissian photog with life, street pictures taken on the phone. Hundreds of thousands followers.
Phone works for him as the camera. He recived nomination in NY. In interview with him he didn't mentioned how camera was inspiring him. I don't think GW and HCB were inspired by Leica.
It is just about finding right tool to be unubstructive.
Finding cameras motivating is still unclear to me. Is hammer motivating the nailer?
 

Luckless

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
1,362
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
Finding cameras motivating is still unclear to me. Is hammer motivating the nailer?

I own some decent hand tools that make wood working a pleasure... The tools we use matter to us. Well, to some of us at least.
 
OP
OP
Hood

Hood

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2018
Messages
11
Location
Perth, Australia
Format
35mm
Where is Rissian photog with life, street pictures taken on the phone. Hundreds of thousands followers.
Phone works for him as the camera. He recived nomination in NY. In interview with him he didn't mentioned how camera was inspiring him. I don't think GW and HCB were inspired by Leica.
It is just about finding right tool to be unubstructive.
Finding cameras motivating is still unclear to me. Is hammer motivating the nailer?
I am a stone mason and machinist by trade. Good tools make even that work more pleasurable, and even inspire me to go that extra mile with work or to try something new because they give you the faith you can pull it off. So yes, I do still believe the tools can be part of the inspiration/motivation to get out and go and create fresh work. Just from the desire to go use your nice tools. But as said above, each to their own I guess...
 

Ko.Fe.

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,209
Location
MiltON.ONtario
Format
Digital
I own some decent hand tools that make wood working a pleasure... The tools we use matter to us. Well, to some of us at least.

I am a stone mason and machinist by trade. Good tools make even that work more pleasurable, and even inspire me to go that extra mile with work or to try something new because they give you the faith you can pull it off. So yes, I do still believe the tools can be part of the inspiration/motivation to get out and go and create fresh work. Just from the desire to go use your nice tools. But as said above, each to their own I guess...

This explains it. I'm not handy, never been, not going to be. I fixed some cameras, but I'm not after tools, just into photography :smile:.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom