And with practice, you can see the subject before it enters the viewfinder, in the viewfinder, and after it leaves the viewfinder, all of which can be very important in shooting action, when using something other than an SLR. This is not to mention that some rangefinder cameras have more accurate focusing than an SLR. I have both.......Regards!Theoretically yes, but in practice you see what you shoot...
Theoretically yes, but in practice you see what you shoot...
yeah i agree but a split second i do not know if
it would really matter much to me my reflexes are slower than my camera's ...
I wonder how well you see from one meter to infinity with SLR. In RF window all is in focus all the time. But on practice nothing beats 1:1 brightline finder, which you could slap on anything. LOL.
Of course, when you get your prints back from the drug store, you'll wonder why everything isn't in focus like it was in the viewfinder.I wonder how well you see from one meter to infinity with SLR. In RF window all is in focus all the time.
maybe its because i was weened on a slr, but i don't find i ever need to look from 1m to infinity, ever.I wonder how well you see from one meter to infinity with SLR. In RF window all is in focus all the time. But on practice nothing beats 1:1 brightline finder, which you could slap on anything. LOL.
cameras are not a good investment; buy them to use them but don't expect to get your money back; buy them to use them o0r love them and keep them for that reason; talk to an investment broker for investments not a camera dealer.So I've been listening to these audio books by Thomas Stanley about Millionaires. And they're really influencing me. He says that the people who are actually wealthy, don't buy luxury items and that if you do, you will never save enough to be a real millionaire.
I have a Leica M6 Classic, with Canadian 35 Summicron version 4. And one of the reasons why I bought this camera was so that I could chit chat with passersby about it. I've been asked "Is that a Leica?" at least fifty times now, and it was fun, I've even made some friends. It's an awesome camera and I love it. But I could probably sell it for a few thousand and pay down my credit card.
Does a Leica appreciate at 12% (my Visa interest rate)? I'm guessing probably not.
Is there anyone else, so crazy as to have bought a Leica on credit!?
maybe its because i was weened on a slr, but i don't find i ever need to look from 1m to infinity, ever.
ive never had problems with fast photographic situations and i can open one eye and look outside the camera
and one eye through the camera just like with a leica if i want .. maybe i am clueless but ive never found an slr to be
an impediment to my photography.i do have an use a few RFs
getting back to the OP, and thedancefloor's 6 year old thread
OP
anything is an investment... and plenty of people buy everything from 85¢ biscotti to automobiles on credit
YMMV
( added later after i had a cup of coffee )
seems the cameras that are a good investment are those
that were OWNED and USED by someone famous or a pioneer of photography.
maybe HCB's leica, winograd's leica the camera Nicéphore Niépce used to make the first photographs, or Daguerre's .. or nadar's or karsh's ...
maybe after you buy yours and you become famous yours will be worth $$ too?
Is the Leica an "Investment?"
It's a kind of grave robbing, isn't it?My ROI is the enjoyment I get with these fine mechanical instruments, which I can afford now that they are decades old.
Ha! Kinda— I suspect much of the stuff I get is from relatives selling off dead dad’s camera gear from the top shelf of the closet. My kids are going to sell off a LOT of stuff when I fall off the twig!It's a kind of grave robbing, isn't it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?