Is the fixer really needed?

reub2000

Member
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
660
Location
Evanston, IL
Format
35mm
On Sunday morning, I developed a negative in a caffenol developer. I don't have any fixer, and I was curious to see what would happen to film that wasn't fixed. So I developed the film, washed it, and then turned on the lights. Image is there, but the antihalation backing is still there so the film is opaque.

A couple days have gone by. The negative is still hanging in my laundry room, with light free to fall on the film. The image is still visible on the negative. It makes sense to me, because even though the negative is getting fogged, it's just latent fogging with nothing to develop it.
 

noseoil

Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
2,887
Location
Tucson
Format
Multi Format
Obviously, since the film isn't printable anyway, the fixer isn't really needed. Now, if you actually want to print the image, don't fix it and you will have answered your own question. Best, tim
 

Helen B

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2004
Messages
1,590
Location
Hell's Kitch
Format
Multi Format
... It makes sense to me, because even though the negative is getting fogged, it's just latent fogging with nothing to develop it.

What you call 'latent fogging' can continue, and convert all the remaining silver halide into silver.

Best,
Helen
 

Neal

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 3, 2004
Messages
2,020
Location
Chicago, West Suburbs
Format
Multi Format
Dear reub2000,

The reason the film is "opaque" is not due to the anti-halation layer. That will have come out in the developer. The problem is that you have not removed the undeveloped silver. Take a section of the film and fix it under room light. You will see why we use fixer.

Neal Wydra
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…