LAG Member Allowing Ads Joined Aug 8, 2016 Messages 1,006 Location The moon Format Multi Format Mar 5, 2017 #26 mjk said: I was attempting to concur and offer my own anecdata. Mike Click to expand... thank you!
Photo Engineer Subscriber Allowing Ads Joined Apr 19, 2005 Messages 29,018 Location Rochester, NY Format Multi Format Mar 5, 2017 #27 mjk said: I was attempting to concur and offer my own anecdata. Mike Click to expand... I completely understood that Mike! Thanks for your input. PE
mjk said: I was attempting to concur and offer my own anecdata. Mike Click to expand... I completely understood that Mike! Thanks for your input. PE
spacecadet Member Allowing Ads Joined May 16, 2016 Messages 19 Location San Francisco Format Multi Format Mar 18, 2017 #28 Jeff Bradford said: Did you push it in processing or did you develop as per "normal" C-41 rules? I'm curious because I may actually use some Portra 400 on something this weekend where I had planned on using all TMAX 400. Click to expand... More examples for you. This was 1 week ago, I shot Portra 160 at 1600 and developed at the started times/temps for C41.
Jeff Bradford said: Did you push it in processing or did you develop as per "normal" C-41 rules? I'm curious because I may actually use some Portra 400 on something this weekend where I had planned on using all TMAX 400. Click to expand... More examples for you. This was 1 week ago, I shot Portra 160 at 1600 and developed at the started times/temps for C41.