Is it advisable to finish rinse with photo flo when using the 3 step C41 kits.

Couples

A
Couples

  • 1
  • 0
  • 32
Exhibition Card

A
Exhibition Card

  • 2
  • 0
  • 67
Flying Lady

A
Flying Lady

  • 6
  • 1
  • 89
Wren

D
Wren

  • 2
  • 0
  • 53

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,039
Messages
2,785,160
Members
99,787
Latest member
jesudel
Recent bookmarks
0

GaryFlorida

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
306
Location
Venice
Format
Multi Format
My kit has Dev, Blix and Stabilizer. With B&W I final rinse with photo flo. Is that advisable with the C41 process as well?

Thanks
Gary
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
Yes. It avoids watermarks. Especially if your water is hard. Been a while since I processed C-41, but use stabilizer which if I remember correctly, is like Photoflo, but with formaldehyde in it.
 

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
NO< NO< NO<

No Photoflo.

The stabilizer/final rinse does the same job plus more. Photoflo would wash away the "more".
 
OP
OP
GaryFlorida

GaryFlorida

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
306
Location
Venice
Format
Multi Format
Yes. It avoids watermarks. Especially if your water is hard. Been a while since I processed C-41, but use stabilizer which if I remember correctly, is like Photoflo, but with formaldehyde in it.

Isnt Formaldehyde really really really really bad for people to be exposed to? I thought that was banned in some slide film development kits? Didnt know they used it in C41 kits.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Last edited by a moderator:

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Isnt Formaldehyde really really really really bad for people to be exposed to? I thought that was banned in some slide film development kits? Didnt know they used it in C41 kits.

Well to stabilize the film you need a reactive chemical that can combine with any unreacted couplers. This is usually formaldehyde or some other aldehyde. The problem with formaldehyde is from chronic exposure as say in a house from various adhesives or other materials used in construction. It is all in the amount. At one time formaldehyde was used to preserve milk. A drop or two of 38% solution was added to each quart. It was a better alternative than contracting bovine TB or some other cattle disease.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
GaryFlorida

GaryFlorida

Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
306
Location
Venice
Format
Multi Format
Well to stabilize the film you need a reactive chemical that can combine with any unreacted couplers. This is usually formaldehyde or some other aldehyde. The problem with formaldehyde is from chronic exposure as say in a house from various adhesives or other materials used in construction. It is all in the amount. A one time formaldehyde was used to preserve milk. A drop or two of 38% solution was added to each quart. It was a better alternative than contracting bovine TB or some other cattle disease.

I know its used in plywood and particle board isnt it? Also in cardboard. I inhaled a lot of cardboard dust when i worked for UPS back in the day. I hope it doesnt catch up with me.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom