Kenmore camera says they can't sell enough 8x10 to warrant keeping it in stock.
The older Fuji 180mm I might try on a relatively close-up scene, but with anything else I would need to include the loss of sharp coverage in the corners (even it well-illuminated) into the composition.
@Andrew O'Neill I actually called Fred Newman a couple of months ago and got the same response from him. I thought about making my own, I might yet do that.
@Ian C Thank you. I've looked through the info on the KHB site and had seen the Jollinger info too. My main reason for the jump to 8x10 is also a contact process. I'm going to try and not get too wrapped up in the potential of a big piece of equipment. When I can finally see it and know whether it's a complete machine or not, that will be the decision day. Can we say that any 8x10 enlarger is still common on the used market?
My hesitancy is a catch 22. It will likely be mothballed for at least 18 months if I do decide to buy it, but because I can't put it into service right away, I feel like I should pass. Way back when I was in college, I never printed bigger than 16x20 due to cost. It seems somewhat logical to bump 8x10negs up to a 20x24 paper size, but the darkroom space needed for 20x24 printing starts getting rather large.
Oh, I got some cryptic info from the place it would be coming from. It had been in service for a couple of years, but saw very little use. The gentleman I spoke with said his concern would be for the internal filters. I didn't even bring up the question of power supplies and/or relays.
The longshot could be that a friendship blossoms with whomever else may be interested in the thing and has space to set it up.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?