Interesting use of fixer in film development

Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
2,725
Location
India
Format
Multi Format
I remember reading here or in another forum one photographer reporting his experiments where he used fixer with developer for handling high contrast film. He had presented some data along with his method. Unfortunately I'm unable to find the particular discussion thread. I searched this forum using several keywords but couldn’t reach that thread. Can you help me? Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,356
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Welcome to APUG Photorio

That would be a bad move. Fixer will kill the developer.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Really bad idea!
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,934
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
I think that OP may be referring to a monobath as a means of developing which he thinks may have the added advantage of dealing with high contrast situation.

pentaxuser
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,934
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
So we swing from it being a bad idea to a link which says it works! How do we reconcile this difference?

pentaxuser
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,873
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
You can contaminate developer with fixer.
You can also modify developer with tiny amounts of fixer.
And you can in some circumstances actually make fixer and developer work together in a monobath - but it works differently with different films and different developers - i.e. it is really quite tricky.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Jul 28, 2016
Messages
2,725
Location
India
Format
Multi Format
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
Aren't monobath developers a mix of film developer and fix?
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format

Grant Haist who as an engineer for Kodak did extensive research on monobaths and wrote The Monobath Manual eventually came to the conclusion that they were not worth the effort. They offer no advantage and are more expensive than conventional developers.

Unless precautions are taken addition of fixer can lead to high levels of fog.
 
Last edited:

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
Here we go again. Doing something differently for the sake of doing something differently.
 
Last edited:

Craig75

Member
Joined
May 9, 2016
Messages
1,234
Location
Uk
Format
35mm
why? what's your technique for developing adox cms20 if you dont want to spend $2 a roll on their developer?
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2009
Messages
6,297
Format
Multi Format
Here we go again. Doing something differently for the sake of doing something differently.
What's old is new again. But to be fair, a monobath system of development worked well for Polaroid.
 

Craig75

Member
Joined
May 9, 2016
Messages
1,234
Location
Uk
Format
35mm
So it is about saving money?

For some its the challenge of making their own developer for this film, others dont want to spend $2-3 a roll on adox's developer, and for others adox's developer wont be available in their region
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
monobaths have been used for a long time, not really anything new
most recently with new55
http://www.new55.net/2016/08/12/the-reel-truth-about-monobaths-part-i-35mm/
even talked about here on photrio
https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/monobath-developer.135237/#post-1767398
written about and formulated by haist ( formula posted by gerald )
https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/monobath-developer.135237/#post-1766573
crawley and keeland too
https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/monobath-developers.10935/#post-146858

not sure what the anti monobath backlash is about ..
YMMV
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
What's old is new again. But to be fair, a monobath system of development worked well for Polaroid.

The monobath used by Polaroid was designed for a particular film and was not a general purpose one. Therefore the film and monobath could be designed for one another. For Haist to come up with a general purpose monobath he had to design one that could be adjusted by varying the speeds of the two reactions development and fixation. This was done by addjusting the pH. Speccial purpose monobaths are still used extensively. For example dental X-rays where tine is at a premium.
 
Last edited:

juan

Member
Joined
May 7, 2003
Messages
2,706
Location
St. Simons I
Format
Multi Format
I have and have read Haist’s book. I didn’t see how a mono bath would be worth the trouble. Getting ordinary development right is hard enough with so many variables in the home environment.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…