Interesting question from a co-worker

tjaded

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
1,020
Location
San Francisc
Format
Multi Format
Hi all--
Today a co-worker and I were talking about various cameras and he asked what the lightest medium format camera is. I know that of the ones I have personally used it would be a Rolleiflex. Anyone have any ideas? Essentially he is a Holga guy, likes the square format but is getting tired of the Holga as a camera. The only time I really notice the weight of my Hasselblad would be when I am shooting with the 40mm Distagon...my arm/elbow usually hurt by the end of the day (but it is SOOOO worth it!) Anyway, just curious if anyone has any insight on this semi-useless topic.

Adios,
Matt
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,466
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
Presumably you're speaking of "real" cameras, vs the Holga variety.
120 folders come to mind, or perhaps Rolliecords, since they aren't quite as complicated as Rolleiflex's.
All of the other MF camera's I've used or that I can think of, are considerably heavier than those.
 

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,759
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
Tell your co-worker to start carrying a brick around when they have a free hand. When they get used to that, the Hasselblad is not a problem!

I LIKE the heft of a well built camera; it helps steady the shot...
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
My Voigtlander Perkeo II is lighter and more compact than some 35mm rangefinders.
 

Daniel-OB

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2006
Messages
54
Format
35mm
Newer used Holga but I think it could make just different and nothing more.
 

3Dfan

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
221
Format
35mm RF
I'd bet a lubitel would be pretty darn light.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,927
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I would guess a Kodak Brownie Hawkeye.

Matt
 

Phillip P. Dimor

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
1,057
Location
Westport, MA
Format
Large Format
I'd say a folder too. They are easy to pack and carry too. Usually pretty affordable as well. I had/have a Tower TLR that I carried everywhere with me over the holidays a few years ago. The screen was not overly bright but it was very easy to carry with me and even fit in a large coat pocket.

Out of the cameras that i'm using now, lightest would be my pentax 645.
 

jovo

Membership Council
Subscriber
Joined
Feb 8, 2004
Messages
4,120
Location
Jacksonville
Format
Multi Format
I've only held six different MF cameras (3 TLRs and 3 SLRs), but when I put down my P67 to heft a friend's Hassie, I was astonished at how light it was and how heavy my Pentax was. If weight were a deciding factor in choosing a high quality MF camera, Hasselblad would be my first choice pretty damn quick!
 

Dan Fromm

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
6,823
Format
Multi Format
titrisol said:
The Isolettes are lightweights compared to any TLR
So should most other folder
Click to expand...
Nah, you must never have held an Ensign. My 820 weighs, relatively, a ton. But its 6x9 and it is lighter than my Ansco Automatic Reflex.

For 6x6, I second David's suggestion of a Perkeo. Or a Bessa 66. But not an Isolette, unless already brought back to near-new condition. Run of the mine old Isolettes tend to be problematic.
 

Edwardv

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2005
Messages
396
Format
Medium Format
How about a Plauble Makina 6x7, lens Nikon 80mm f2.8? Not too heavy or too light. I would say just right.
 

nicolai

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
190
Location
San Francisc
Format
Multi Format
Most box cameras weigh next to nothing, and I've seen some ridiculously good work done with them.
 

Craig

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
2,330
Location
Calgary
Format
Multi Format
For a good, modern, camera it would be one of the Fuji rangefinders. I've got a 6x9 and the lens on that is amazing.
 

k_jupiter

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
2,569
Location
san jose, ca
Format
Multi Format
The lightest I have had is a Ilford Sportsman. but then again, it was a piece of crap just north of a Holga. I turned mine into a pinhole. For something for taking real photos, the Zeiss Nettars 6x6 are the lightest I now have. The Voightlander Perko is just a bit heavier, and with that Skopar lens, a better deal IMHO.

The Nettar does take nice photos, nothing to be ashamed of. I would recommend a Ikonta with a Tessar lens 6x6. Best bang for the buck, fits in an overcoat pocket.

tim in san jose
 

Will S

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2004
Messages
716
Location
Madison, Wis
Format
8x10 Format
For a modern coupled rangefiner, the Fuji GS645 is pretty light.

Will
 

jimgalli

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
4,236
Location
Tonopah Neva
Format
ULarge Format
My Minolta Autocord is a wonderful trade-off of an excellent little lens and light as a feather camera.
 

Frank R

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2006
Messages
351
Format
Large Format
Kino said:
Tell your co-worker to start carrying a brick around when they have a free hand. When they get used to that, the Hasselblad is not a problem!

I LIKE the heft of a well built camera; it helps steady the shot...
Click to expand...

Reminds me of what happened at the beginning of this summer: I was testing a 9x12 sheet film camera and a Moscow 5.

Before I went out I found the Moscow 5 to be a little awkward with the viewfinder on the wrong side. I was composing and shooting with the 9x12 and I was doing the typical routine of running through all the steps of taking an all manual photo, but with sheet film and a wire viewfinder.

I remember the feeling of relief I had when I turned to the Moscow 5 and took some shots. Wow, was that an easy camera to use! Roll film, what a great idea! And a viewfinder and rangefinder built in, what a wonder of technology!

Anyway, my vote for a light MF is also a folder. If he has a Holga than even a triplet would be a step up. Tell him to visit certo6.com and get a refurbished one. The baby Bessa (I think it was called the Bessa66) was also a small camera.
 

DBP

Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2006
Messages
1,905
Location
Alexandria,
Format
Multi Format
The lightest I have are folders without coupled rangefinders, followed by TLRs. The two folders I have with rangefinders are a Moskva 5 and a Mamiya 6, and neither is light. My 1920s Bessa is probably the lightest 120 camera I have at 468g. As for some others, Isolette 530g, Mamiya 6 folder 870g, the Moskva 5 874g, Rolleicord 846g, , CiroFlex 972g, Yashicamat 124G 1050g, Arax 88CM with back and 80mm lens (same size as Hasselblad) 1650g with W/L, 1930g with non-metered prism, and 2x3 Speed Graphic 1675g. By comparison, a 375 page lightweight paperback book is about 200g.
 

ijsbeer

Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2005
Messages
210
Format
Multi Format
I think my Mamiya RZ is not to heavy. Or does that come from the pleasure it gives me when shooting with it.
 

Bandicoot

Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Messages
200
Location
Eastern Engl
Format
Multi Format
There are older folders that are lighter, but my favourite modern(ish) lightweight MF camera is the Fujica GS645S. Nice to handle, light and compact, and the lens is spectacular. I think it would be hard to find a MF camera with 'modern' optics that was much lighter than that.


Peter
 

IloveTLRs

Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
1,132
Location
Boston
Format
Sub 35mm
I'd vote for a folder, too. I've got a Minolta Semi-P that's very light.
 

bjorke

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
2,260
Location
SF sometimes
Format
Multi Format
Most of the volume in any camera is empty airspace. As long as there's no prism, the real weight is in the lens. Slow lens == light weight. Hence TLR's. Makes my Bronica 645 RF not heavier than my G2, too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…