With RC paper negatives it can be a plus... you can squeegee the papers together and get good positive contact even without glass pressing them, especially if you print onto fiber based paper. I've never tried it with film. When I read about newspaper photographers just shaking off the film then printing in an enlarger, it sounds messy to me too!NedL. I have heard people say that they print wet, but I have had a terrible time with it. The negs want to stick to the glass or to the paper and I end up with a mess. Thats why I wait until the negatives are dry, then print. I have never tried it with paper negatives but I think I'll have to give it a try.
Instead of shooting a lot of film and going back to it later to develop and print, she decided to go out every day, shoot, come back home, and develop, print, mount, and put it on the wall, all in one day. I was wondering if anyone else uses this method? It makes perfect sense to me.
As she said, she basically wanted to get herself out of the equation, to simply be an observer. Just stay w/ the process, and don't go through the usual judging over whether or not one image should be the one to come back to later, or deciding whether to tone one, print one another way, etc. Just get it up on the wall and see what you have.
I have great admiration for her work, but can't quite understand why this method of process, printing and mounting in the same day should improve practice. Can those of you who understand please enlighten me?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?