Interesting article on Ansel Adams' "Pure photography"

snusmumriken

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
2,567
Location
Salisbury, UK
Format
35mm
I think this touches on the core of the issue. I've always been fascinated by the way really strong photos survive the worst travesties of picture editors, printers and online copying. Others are unremarkable until some beyond-Adams darkroom wizard works on them. Levoy et al are able to create automated processes that substitute for the wizard. Of course there will always be scope for choice, good taste and judgement, but doesn't it shift the emphasis of just where creativity begins and ends?
 

faberryman

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
Everything in "The Negative" and "The Print" is quite elementary anyway. I gave away my copies long ago.
I gave away my copies of The Negative and The Print long ago too. Sometimes when I look at my photographs I think maybe I should have kept them. Sometimes when I look at other people's photographs I think maybe I gave away my copies to the wrong people. I am not sure whether Drew or I gave away our copies earlier, so I don't know who should get the trophy. Anyway, I don't have time to worry about that now. The banjo festival starts next week and I have to arrange the hay bales. We are hoping Bela Fleck will be there.

 
Last edited:

snusmumriken

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 22, 2021
Messages
2,567
Location
Salisbury, UK
Format
35mm

So long as they don't feel you should have kept them!
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,219
Format
8x10 Format
Well, it would have been nice for those books to be returned, so that I could have loaned them out again to another beginner. But as far as the real "keeper" book as the companion to that set, I still have on the shelf, "Examples", which is mainly photo reproductions rather than text. Of course, I have certain big coffee-table books of AA too. But having seen so much of his work in person, and even having once shared a big retrospective with him, I rely mainly on memory concerning his actual print quality. Some of of my favorite images of his have rarely if ever been reproduced in book fashion.

Otherwise, I'm glad to have learned the Zone System, though it's now way behind in the rear view mirror. It remains in my tool box, somewhere down in there, if I ever need it. Zone-speak is also a helpful common-denominator lingo on forums like this one. It's certainly a lot more specific than simply referring to "pushing" or "pulling" film development. But there is no reason to make a kooky religion out of the Zone System, like Minor White did.
 
Last edited:

Mike Lopez

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
656
Format
Multi Format
I'll be taking my daughter to Nashville for the first time this summer. We're going to take in Brandi Carlile and The Indigo Girls. We're both excited.
 

faberryman

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
I'll be taking my daughter to Nashville for the first time this summer. We're going to take in Brandi Carlile and The Indigo Girls. We're both excited.
Brandi Carlisle is of course an incredible talent, and you are sure to have a great experience with your daughter at the concert.
 

jtk

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2007
Messages
4,943
Location
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Format
35mm

Just my perspective, from many friendships with Minor White's students...but I don't think Minor or any of them "made a kooky religion" out of Zone System. Many spent time engaged in Zen and even Roman Catholicism. (like Minor did).
 

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,219
Format
8x10 Format
I'm convinced he was the same person as the nutty professor in "Back to the Future". But he sure made some compelling prints, in spite of himself.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,480
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
He is as knowledgeable as anyone else who writes opinion articles on Internet forums and magazines. He knows exactly what he is talking about.

You have major logical and factual disconnects in your statement. Just because one writes internet opinion articles and magazines, does not in any way show or imply that they know what they are writing or posting especially if they are spewing to earn money to cover their bills. Or as a sage once said many journalists are people who can write but never had an original thought in their life.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,979
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
Or as a sage once said many journalists are people who can write but never had an original thought in their life.

That's a non sequitur.

Maybe what JNP (?) was suggesting was simply that the writer of the article wrote what he knows the reader wants to read. Or perhaps, as an opinion piece, it is just an opinion and the author would likely know his own opinion. There was nothing necessarily illogical in @JNP's statement.
 
  • JNP
  • Deleted
  • Reason: I want nothing to do with Sirius Glass

DREW WILEY

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2011
Messages
14,219
Format
8x10 Format
I call it "filler". Not real content, just more spin of the same old thing over and over again.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,480
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Some filler I have read does not even deserve the filler category. Other filler covers what someone new to the field with be able to use to start building a foundation.
 

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
7,979
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
Filler:
How many Intro to Photography books were published between 1960 and 1990? There was practically nothing new to say in any of them. There's no reason internet posts or videos should be any different. You can stop reading or watching at any point (just like you didn't have to buy The Art of Color Photography when it came out).
 

JNP

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2022
Messages
52
Location
Resting
Format
Hybrid

Maybe the sun is over the yard arm.
 

jnamia

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2022
Messages
185
Location
local
Format
Multi Format
I know I posted this link, but should we pay attention to him but perhaps refer to art historians instead? Levoy is after all more of an engineer and not and artist nor an art historian.

im a trained art and architectural historian ... and I think the author or the article is completely correct. that's not to say that people who practice "f64 straight pure photography don't have style" the look they are attempting to achieve with everything being in focus and hyper reality is their style. they were "digital" before digital ... and if they cry "no manipulation" they are ignoring most of what they do.

Levoy’s thought process can certainly be applied to digital photography but can be extended even to film photography. Different films provide different looks to the same scene, lending credence to the idea that all forms of photography can be considered under his argument.

in complete agreement, and he's forgetting developers and papers as well. not sure it matters though, because people who use film and are great at this style will take offense to what he said as if his comments are a slight upon their style and photographic practice. I find no difference between film photography and digital photography, they are pretty much the same thing, light sensitive medium, indexed something, and someone changing what was on the film or file ( either before or after ) to get what they want .. dark room prints and digital prints are sometimes indistinguishable, sometimes they are even better. sometimes worse, and under glass not sure why it matters other than bragging rights sometimes .. not saying making pure photographs isn't fun, I guess it is, but so is everything else..
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…