interest in bronica S2A nikkor 50 2.8?

Camel Rock

A
Camel Rock

  • 6
  • 0
  • 77
Wattle Creek Station

A
Wattle Creek Station

  • 9
  • 1
  • 78
Cole Run Falls

A
Cole Run Falls

  • 3
  • 2
  • 63
Clay Pike

A
Clay Pike

  • 5
  • 1
  • 66

Forum statistics

Threads
198,944
Messages
2,783,604
Members
99,756
Latest member
Kieran Scannell
Recent bookmarks
0

rphenning

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
341
Location
California
Format
Med. Format RF
I have listed this thing on ebay, here, and rangefinder forum a few times and no one has bitten. Do people still use the s2? Seemed like a great camera whe nI had one. Just curious.
 

RustedChrome

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
29
Location
Hockessin, D
Format
35mm RF
I'd love to have one but I can't invest much into it. It seems like the SQ and ETR series get all the support and use nowdays.
 

Chris Lange

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
770
Location
NY
Format
Multi Format
My good friend has, and uses, an S2 as his only medium format camera, he likes it quite a bit, and I've seen some outstanding negatives turned out by him.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
I have one, and it's a very good lens, but the market for pretty much all medium format equipment has been depressed for a while, and S-era Bronica equipment hasn't been selling for a very high price unless it's something unusual, which isn't to say it isn't worth using.
 
OP
OP
rphenning

rphenning

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
341
Location
California
Format
Med. Format RF
yeah the slides i got back from the one roll i shot with it looked amazing. wish i hadn't broke it. being 16 sucked.
 

darinwc

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 14, 2003
Messages
3,146
Location
Sacramento,
Format
Multi Format
A few people use the bronica.. but as it was a fairly unreliable camera to begin with, and now quite venerable, there is not much demand.

my first medium format camera was a bronica S. I really liked it and I was very pleased with the quality of the images.

However it locked up very badly. I replaced it with an S2 which sometimes worked, but I much prefered the rack-and pinion focussing of the original S.

I sold it a few years back. While I miss shooting 6x6, I dont plan on going back to the Bronica S system simply for reliability/repair issues.
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
The Nikkor 50/2.8 is also more desirable than the 50/3.5, not only because it's a more advanced design, but it uses 77mm filters, so it can take more common lens shades and accessories.
 

skuuterboy

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2010
Messages
2
Format
Medium Format
I've been looking for the Nikkor 2.8/50 for my Bronica S2A. I have the older 3.5/50 nikkor but am keen on the newer faster lens. I'm interested.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom