• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Inside Analog Photo Radio - Ron Mowrey - Photo Engineer - Where Kodak Went Wrong

Scott_Sheppard

Advertiser
Advertiser
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 16, 2007
Messages
272
Format
Multi Format

Jim Noel

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 6, 2005
Messages
2,261
Format
Large Format
Only the Document Tree is evident in the XML link.
 

PKM-25

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
1,980
Location
Enroute
Format
Multi Format
Does it also discuss what could go right from this point, especially considering Kodak's still outstanding film line up? Because frankly, in terms of what Kodak could have done, the past is done, it does nothing for me personally as a photographer...
 

SWphoto

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
318
Location
Tempe, AZ
Format
Multi Format
Scott,

maybe it's on the podcast, but what's up with Kodak and the "out of stock" on so many vendors' websites, esp. for 4x5 Portras? Are they going the way of the dodo?

Rick
 

Derek Lofgreen

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 8, 2006
Messages
907
Location
Minnesota
Format
Multi Format
Great interview Scott and Ron. What a great insight into Kodak past decision making, it's no surprise they are where the are today. Good thoughts and prayers to all the retired Kodak folks, I hope you get a longer end of the stick.

D.
 

EASmithV

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 22, 2008
Messages
1,984
Location
Virginia
Format
Large Format
Looks like Kodak is setting itself up for a hard fall...

Man, now I gotta start either hoarding Tri-X or switching over to Ilford.

Just when I start liking Portra...
 

PKM-25

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
1,980
Location
Enroute
Format
Multi Format
Grrrr...I better listen to this after-all....

EASmithV said:
Looks like Kodak is setting itself up for a hard fall...

Man, now I gotta start either hoarding Tri-X or switching over to Ilford.

Just when I start liking Portra...
Click to expand...
 

PKM-25

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
1,980
Location
Enroute
Format
Multi Format
Good work Ron and Scott, quite a problematic attempt at a transition for sure.

Judging by the current scale of operation and the expected drop in motion picture consumables, it's really tough to say how this is going to look in even a year, let alone 2-3.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Coming soon from Scott, an interview between him, myself and Bob Shanebrook. Very interesting subject matter and it touches somewhat on this current interview.

Thans all for listening and for your comments.

PE
 

zsas

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 12, 2011
Messages
1,955
Location
Chicago, IL
Format
35mm RF
Scott/Ron - Just listened, amazing, that floppy with the holes in it?! Wow...
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Andy;

That happened to all Double Sided floppies about 10 years earlier but for a different reason and it was not as bad. Kodak somehow ignored that lesson. It was pressure on 2 heads squeezing the diskette and the wear on the magnetic heads embedded in the ceramic, which itself had bubbles. Jewelers Rouge is an abrasive and in simplest terms the medium on a diskette is exactly that!

PE
 

kb3lms

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 24, 2006
Messages
1,004
Location
Reading, PA
Format
35mm
Great program guys!

Dovetails very well with what I, too, saw at EK from 1984 through 1995. I knew a number of the guys that worked at the Gerber plant and some came into my group after the demise of that project. A really talented bunch of (working) people, like most of EK, but really made you wonder what was happening at the top.

FWIW, during the demise of the high capacity floppy disk project, it started being called the EktaFlop around the Elmgrove plant. (little insider trivia there) Whatever happened to EP anyway? I can't imagine there's anything still there? (of Kodak, anyway)

But, I was just a youngster. Ron, you obviously understood much, much more. One interesting thing, though. My group was staffed with a bunch of recent college graduates. (Our manager really had his work cut out for him. ) About 1985 we conducted a review of the digital technologies we might employ on our project - kind of a kaizen event, if you will - and we all concluded the game would be over in about 15 years, give or take a few, due to the obviously coming digital capture. So, very new (my group) and experienced people (your group) came to largely the same conclusion but the larger company just couldn't accept it. Amazing.

Anyway, looking forward to more of these excellent programs!
 

ME Super

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 17, 2011
Messages
1,479
Location
Central Illinois, USA
Format
Multi Format
Ron,
You are definitely right about the Electrical Engineers and Chemical Engineers not knowing what the other side was doing. I'm an EE by degree and a software guy by career, and don't pretend to understand 1% of what you film guys were doing at Kodak, only that it worked really well. You Chemical Engineers definitely know your stuff!

You're also definitely right about nobody printing photos at home. Why, when you can upload and print on someone else's printer/lightjet so inexpensively (and conveniently, I might add), would you want to print on your own printer with less than stable inks? If Kodak was going to go into the printer business, they should've beat Fuji to the punch with their Frontier digital minilabs and dry minilabs (shh, don't tell the guys I work with that I prefer prints on real photo paper, not inkjet!), not by tring to get into the home printing market.

FWIW, I'd much rather have a color laser printer than an inkjet. Much lower cost of operation than inkjet. And I still wouldn't print photos for sharing or putting in photo albums on it - maybe the occasional DVD cover for home videos, but that would be about it.

ME Super
 
OP
OP

Scott_Sheppard

Advertiser
Advertiser
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 16, 2007
Messages
272
Format
Multi Format
Thanks Sean !!

Wait till you here the next one with Ron Mowery & Robert Shanebrook... It will blow your mind !!

And THANKS everybody !!
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format

FWIW, one of the last pieces of work I did in the Exploratory Color Photography Lab was to design a pollution free high speed processing and printing unit. It ran at 120 deg F and produced a print in a few seconds using Ektacolor 30 paper. (this was 1978)

The unit used mixed bed resins to clean the water and it produced no pollution. Wash water was totally recycled. The project was cancelled in favor of several other routes including Instant.

Re-Ektaflop, we were going to call our instant product Kodaroid in honor of Polaroid, but since we were only half way there and were straining hard, we called it Hemiroid (misspelling deliberate to convey meaning)

PE
 

pbromaghin

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 30, 2010
Messages
3,852
Location
Castle Rock, CO
Format
Multi Format
I have a question that I hope will not stir up a storm. I am not trolling.

Ron, you said that Kodak makes all it's own film base and if they stop making film, the other base suppliers will benefit from the increased demand from other film manufacturers. But in the recent controversies, one of Aristophanes's main points was that Kodak buys base from other manufacturers, and if Kodak goes under then the base suppliers may also go under and this will threaten the supply for Ilford, Efke, Foma, etc.

I don't remember you pointing this out at the time (I bailed out of those threads). Would you elaborate on this?
 

keithwms

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format
I'll just insert my thoughts. If the largest consumer of base goes under, then sure, the base price will go up, but not catastrophically. It's not like Kodak stops making base and *poof* no more base available in the world. On the contrary, the demand is still basically there- remember that Kodak has become less and less relevant in terms of market share and it hasn't adversely affected others in the market. We know that because the prices for Ilford's and Fuji's products have not shot up astronomically (knock on wood).

Also, Ron pointed out that base can probably be stored indefinitely. That is a very important point which also mitigates a big spike in base cost.

Ron knows a lot more of course, I am just throwing in my half penny
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Bob Shanebrook points out in his book that all or virtually all of Kodak's film base support is made in-house. Film supports are made for other applications than photography though so the production of support such as Estar or Acetate is not dependent on Kodak's consumption of the material. They are a minor player due to their own capacity.

The major differences in films industry wide is the subbing or lack thereof for each application. Kodak makes unsubbed and subbed film supports. You can buy subbed or unsubbed supports from ICI in England for a variety of applications and IIRC, Ilford buys from ICI. Jim Browning used ICI produced Melenex support for his dye transfer Matrix Film. It was pre-subbed to a given standard for the dye transfer process.

There will be no major problem if Kodak stops making (or buying) support. In fact, they may stop making entirely and start buying which will probably be good in a sense. Prices will go up though due to increasing labor and materials costs, but not because Kodak changes anything.

PE
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register