Incredible

Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 3
  • 0
  • 61
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 9
  • 1
  • 83
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 3
  • 0
  • 60
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 3
  • 0
  • 57

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,837
Messages
2,781,627
Members
99,722
Latest member
Backfocus
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP
RattyMouse

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
So, Polaroid, with a large R&D staff and many millions of dollars, managed to produce stable SX-70 film in 1966 and onwards with other integral films.

Was this process described in a patent? Probably not, as it would've expired by now and be available to copy. So it remained a trade secret. Still, I'm surprised that Impossible has gotten this far, yet cannot get that final crucial step of image stability.

Considering the extreme cost of this film, and the short term image quality, I'm amazed that they can stay in business.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
... FP100c ... $29.99/ea ...egregious profiteering ...

A certain company I won't name is asking $39.99 for FP-100C and $45.99 for FP-3000B. In comparison, $29.99 almost looks reasonable.

There are deals to be found. Last week I made a special trip to a store for their last six boxes of FP-100C at $16.50 each.

As P T Barnum supposedly would have said, "There's a sucker born every minute"

Yet, many people like myself want to support Impossible and have them succeed in this Quixotic venture. I want to continue to use my nice SX-70, SLR690, and Spectra. Perhaps I'm delusional thinking that my own prints won't fade. Anyway, I continue to use it.
 

jeffreyg

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 12, 2008
Messages
2,641
Location
florida
Format
Medium Format
Bring back the good OLD days.:smile:

http://www.jeffreyglasser.com/

polaroid.jpg
 

monkowa

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
51
Location
Missoula, Mo
Format
35mm
Everybody sounds so entitled and whiny in this thread. Don't use the film if it's that much of a problem. I have shot the crappy first gen IP film and just recently finished a color and B&W pack of the new 3.0 formula. I have run into no problems with color shifting in the newer B&W shots and I find their color stuff is now pretty decent. The earlier film was definitely an R&D process. Wasn't that what was advertised at the time? I'll try to post some examples later on but I think Ip is doing some admirable work in trying to keep this format going.
 
OP
OP
RattyMouse

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
Everybody sounds so entitled and whiny in this thread. Don't use the film if it's that much of a problem. I have shot the crappy first gen IP film and just recently finished a color and B&W pack of the new 3.0 formula. I have run into no problems with color shifting in the newer B&W shots and I find their color stuff is now pretty decent. The earlier film was definitely an R&D process. Wasn't that what was advertised at the time? I'll try to post some examples later on but I think Ip is doing some admirable work in trying to keep this format going.

You'd be singing a different tune if your "stability" lasted all of 3 weeks. That's what I got from 2.0 Impossible film. I guess I'm not entitled to more than 3 weeks of image stability.
 

darkosaric

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
4,568
Location
Hamburg, DE
Format
Multi Format
RattyMouse - you should contact Impossible and send them a scans (or even better - send them originals for analyses), and ask is this normal. If they say no - and they will - you can ask to get new packs of films free of charge. It is possible that you got bad batch somehow.
 

guangong

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
3,589
Format
Medium Format
To sum up all the above:Impossible makes a great instant film so long as nobody ever looks at the images under light but only in complete darkness.
 
OP
OP
RattyMouse

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
RattyMouse - you should contact Impossible and send them a scans (or even better - send them originals for analyses), and ask is this normal. If they say no - and they will - you can ask to get new packs of films free of charge. It is possible that you got bad batch somehow.

I could do that, but to me (and only me) it's not worth the effort. I have lost all interest in Impossible Film due to this issue, which from what I read here and elsewhere, is in fact quite normal. I just have to accept that my needs are not met by this film and so have to move on. At least I only paid $70 for my SX-70, so not a huge loss. I was almost going to buy a refurbished one for $400!! OUCH that would have hurt.
 

MrBrowning

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
681
Location
Upstate NY
Format
Multi Format
I know this doesn't help but I have an image I took with Impossible Color film (I think it was Gen 1 but may have been Gen 2) that I used for an emulsion lift and applied to watercolor paper. It's been move around a few times (On the wall, off the wall, back to the wall and currently off the wall). It looks the same as I remember it looking when I lifted it.
 

mooseontheloose

Moderator
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
4,110
Location
Kyoto, Japan
Format
Multi Format
I know this doesn't help but I have an image I took with Impossible Color film (I think it was Gen 1 but may have been Gen 2) that I used for an emulsion lift and applied to watercolor paper. It's been move around a few times (On the wall, off the wall, back to the wall and currently off the wall). It looks the same as I remember it looking when I lifted it.

The same with me - anything lifted is fine, it's the images that remain intact that have the problem. As I mentioned before, I think it has to do with latent chemical reactions after the image is formed. I wish I could find the information - if I do I'll post it here.
 

skorpiius

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
648
Location
Calgary, AB
Format
Medium Format
I know this doesn't help but I have an image I took with Impossible Color film (I think it was Gen 1 but may have been Gen 2) that I used for an emulsion lift and applied to watercolor paper. It's been move around a few times (On the wall, off the wall, back to the wall and currently off the wall). It looks the same as I remember it looking when I lifted it.

I would love to know the step by step directions to doing this
 

MrBrowning

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
681
Location
Upstate NY
Format
Multi Format
What a strange process. The image is heavily damaged during removal.

It doesn't have to be. With practice and care you can get some pretty decent lifts. This was one of my first attempts.

17176603104_20e674cf42_c.jpg
 
OP
OP
RattyMouse

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
It doesn't have to be. With practice and care you can get some pretty decent lifts. This was one of my first attempts.

View attachment 160777

Well, I'm glad that you and others have a process that allows you to enjoy this film. At least there is that. Something like this doesnt appeal to me so it wont save my SX-70 from its imminent departure.
 

MrBrowning

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
681
Location
Upstate NY
Format
Multi Format
Well, I'm glad that you and others have a process that allows you to enjoy this film. At least there is that. Something like this doesnt appeal to me so it wont save my SX-70 from its imminent departure.

Can't say I blame you. I haven't shot any impossible film in quite a while and I don't plan to be in the market anytime soon.
 

Truzi

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
2,651
Format
Multi Format
I've given most my B&W Impossible shots away, so I've not seen how well they age. The color film has been stable for me over a years' time, but they were pretty bad to begin with as I'd not quite gotten the hang of Impossible v. Polaroid.

As far as removing the photo to "stabilize" it. Do you have to lift the emulsion, or is separating the top from the rest of the pack sufficient.

I gave a OneStep SX-70 to a friend at work, and he's going to get some film. I'd explained the contrast issues under harsh lighting to him, and showed him one example in B&W. We went out with my folding SX-70 during lunch, and with never having used Impossible film, he took 3 shots with no contrast issues, lol. He's far better than me - he does pro work, so I guess he's a ringer (he started with film, but necessities of the industry made him move to digital).
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
... The color film has been stable for me over a years' time ...

My Impossible SX-70 color prints so far still look good after a month. I'm encouraged enough to support Impossible and buy their film. I haven't tried their B&W.

I still have some original unused Polaroid SX-70 film and Polaroid 600 film. The SX-70/Time Zero film always looked different from 600 and Spectra film. The SX-70 film seemed more subdued, with more pastel-like shades - sort of a watercolor effect. I really liked it. The 600/Spectra had more contrast and saturation by comparison. The Impossible films are like this as well.
 

mooseontheloose

Moderator
Joined
Sep 20, 2007
Messages
4,110
Location
Kyoto, Japan
Format
Multi Format
As far as removing the photo to "stabilize" it. Do you have to lift the emulsion, or is separating the top from the rest of the pack sufficient.

Truzi, I believe both will work, but I've only ever done the lifts so far.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom