• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Increasing Contrast On Negative During Devlopment

Fujino Trail

H
Fujino Trail

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Dead and Living.

H
Dead and Living.

  • 5
  • 4
  • 83

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,820
Messages
2,830,676
Members
100,972
Latest member
Tom Janu
Recent bookmarks
1

IanBarber

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
126
Location
Doncaster Yorkshire UK
Format
4x5 Format
I am slowly starting to get more familiar now with the developing process of my 120 roll film. I have settled on a single developer and 2 types of film to learn from them.

When it comes to agitation, does contrast increase the more often you agitate or the more vigorous you agitate.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Yes.

Assuming all other things being equal:
More vigorous agitation increases contrast.
More frequent agitation increases contrast.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Since increasing agitation can lead to problems it is not the recommended method of increasing film contrast. It is better to maintain normal agitation and increase the total development time.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Since increasing agitation can lead to problems it is not the recommended method of increasing film contrast. It is better to maintain normal agitation and increase the total development time.

Absolutely agree with the notion that more vigorous agitation can cause problems, but more frequent agitation is not going to cause any problems. My normal agitation is 5s every 30s - but if you use PMK Pyro it's recommended to agitate every 15s, and the negatives are still very evenly developed.
 
OP
OP
IanBarber

IanBarber

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Messages
126
Location
Doncaster Yorkshire UK
Format
4x5 Format
The reason for my question is that I have settled on using HC110 diluted to H (1:63) and I do 2 slow inversions every 30 seconds. I just wanted to confirm that doing the 2 slow inversions every 30 seconds was not going to be problamatic.
 
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
15,715
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
The reason for my question is that I have settled on using HC110 diluted to H (1:63) and I do 2 slow inversions every 30 seconds. I just wanted to confirm that doing the 2 slow inversions every 30 seconds was not going to be problamatic.

Everything about describing agitation is subjective. Slow in one person's mind is snail's pace in another person's mind, and too fast in someone else's mind... :smile:

As long as your agitation works, then it's fine. As long as you get evenly developed negatives, you're doing fine. Shoot some frames using Sunny 16 of a clear blue sky, and see how you do. Adjust agitation technique as necessary.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Whether you do 2 inversions every 30 s or 4 inversions every minute doesn't seem to make much difference. Depending on the developer manufacturer you will see either one methods or the other.
 

gone

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
Two inversions every 30 seconds (and one the last minute) is my standard agitation cycle.

Except for Rodinal :}
 

rwreich

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Messages
344
Location
Greensboro, NC
Format
Multi Format
I use the spindle that comes with the patterson tank. My method is to oscilate between clockwise and counter in a deliberate rhythm that makes for about fifteen pivots in ten seconds every minute.

I find that I don't have to worry about bubbles forming this way.
 

RauschenOderKorn

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 14, 2016
Messages
814
Location
Bavaria, Germany
Format
Medium Format
As already written by fellow APUG members: The answer to your question is "Yes"

But: This will not give you much of a clue what is best. Some people advocate stand development, some people develop film by permanent development in a rotating processor. Furthermore, fast and slow are subjective. and there are other variables.

In the end you have to find a process which works for you. If you are happy with your negatives, then you are doing everything all right.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom