our primary camera for nearly everything was our Graphic View II, which I also still have.
I'm getting stingy with 4x5 film, using roll backs more now than ever
I love my Crown Graphics. I have a couple of 3x4 models (to be fair one is more of a donor camera) and a 4x5. I also have a couple of Speed Graphics floating around here somewhere but the Crown is a much more elegant machine (To paraphrase Obi Won Kenobi).It was a dark winter day when a shiny beautiful thing walked into my life.
Sitting on Blue Moon Camera's showroom shelf was a Crown Graphic Special 4x5 press camera. Fully restored.
I had seen it briefly the night before, just as the shop was closing. When walked in the next day, I pointed to it and said to my coworker behind the counter, "That one. Now!"
I had owned one 50 years ago, purchased from a pawn shop. It was a bit battered, in a battered kit. I lived with it for about four years before I became convinced a field view camera was the answer to all my photographic needs.
Silly me.
View attachment 400566
Decades later, I sold all my large format gear for a digital kit. I'm happy I did, I love my new setup. But something was missing.
Here at the shop, we're surrounded daily by dozens of great analog cameras. Being a digital convert, I had become immune to temptation. Or so I thought.
I've always loved cameras with bellows. They're simpler, and view cameras really are the most versatile cameras that ever were created.
Between nostalgia and a nagging thirst for something tangible, I succumbed to temptation. And anyways, I still had a dozen or more film holders, right?
Why, besides personal history, would I choose this camera? It's solid, rugged, built for hard use. It's compact, it's versatile, and while it has limited camera movements, there are enough for casual use.
The lens is an excellent Schneider Xenar in wonderful condition. Other lenses common to this camera likewise were fine optics. The image circle is somewhat limited, but it's enough.
I've added a couple of lenses to my kit, and a blank lens board fit with a pinhole. The rangefinder makes quick focusing simpler, and the ground glass is there for critical work.
View attachment 400567
Another great thing about these cameras is their availability. We typically have Crown and Speed Graphics in stock, as well as other press cameras.
They're common on auction sites, and they're usually reasonably priced. They come in 4x5", 3x4", and 2x3" formats, with accessories such as roll film backs readily available. They often are sold as kits.
If you're curious about large format but think you don't have the budget, press cameras are an easy entry. You don't even need a lens right away - slap on a pinhole and go to town.
And don't worry if the one that strikes your fancy isn't in pristine condition. They're made to take a beating and keep working, and working, and working.
You can learn more about press and view cameras in the International Camera Museum on our website, and while you're there, sign up for The Loupe, our free weekly newsletter!
He probably shot weddings on Tri-X film packs and happily moved on to a Graflex Strob (correct Graflex spelling) at some point.I've got a Crown Graphic from my parents' studio. Besides studio work, my dad used to shoot weddings with it in the 40s/50s, which sounds like real work - "You'd have your unused flashbulbs in one coat pocket, and the used ones in the other."
Of course, this wasn't like the hundreds of shots taken at weddings later on, the standard package was like 20 finished 8x10s. Just some key formal portraits, a couple of church pics, some table pictures, perhaps a candid dance shot or two.
But Donald, by the time my memories kick in around 1960, our primary camera for nearly everything was our Graphic View II, which I also still have. Here's Dad on location with it in 1968. (I shot this with my Minox B on grainy 60s Tri-X, scanned from a 4x5 print.)
View attachment 400684
I can shoot Fomapan 100 in 4x5 for about the same cost per frame as TMX in 120...
Foma in 4x5 doesn't have the reported issues that 120 does?
He probably shot weddings on Tri-X film packs and happily moved on to a Graflex Strob (correct Graflex spelling) at some point.
I shot a few weddings and my boss at the studio I worked at tried to get me to give up all my summer weekends to shoot them for him for $75.00 per gig. I passed.Probably. But my folks got out of the wedding biz pretty early. By 1960, when my memories begin, they'd stopped doing portraits or covering events and mainly concentrated on product shots and graphic arts work (litho negs, color separations, halftones, etc.)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?