That widelux looks like fun.
I'll keep an eye out for it.
You must have a knack for the canoe. The rapids were the fun parts, we were rolling over in some of the other parts however. It happened twice in one spot and I don't fully underatand why. After we emptied it and got back inside everything should have been fine but it sort of fwlt like something below the water just pushed ua over. The other tqo times happened because we got perpendicular to the current. One of those events was due to colliding with a tree because we couldn't get over to a narrow passage fast enough. Likewise, on the other occassion we had to move rapidly across the stream as we avoided multiple trees and we didn't make it.
I need to study those extension tubes. Unlike the 40mm MadnBad suggested which is fast but it must be used very close, the extension tubes project the image wide like a teleconverter so they waste light and crop in on the middle of the image. Unlike the teleconverter which casts the image wider with a lens and crops it, the extension tube merely crops the image which is cast wider due to the increased distance between the lens and the sensor. I will get some tubes and try it since they are pretty affordable. They might work great with the kit lens or with my 35mm. How long are the lenses you are using? In the meantime I might try using my teleconverter on my 105mm or even on the kit lens. Did Iget it backwards? I read that extension tubes are leas impactful on longer lenses. I also read that they enable lenses to focus on objects nearer than they would otherwise do. Since the 35mm can't get much closer, perhaps the extension tubes will do better on the 105mm and the image from the 35mm will be better at macro when doubled with the teleconverter. There are so many options. It will be fun trying them all.