What makes you think Ilford's profits don't go to the shareholders?
You can be certain, very certain, that the shareholder's profits are constantly under review by the board of directors.
I don't know but I would rather see the extra profit being re-invested in the company (R&D?) than being sucked by parasites.
Who says Ilford makes big profits?
I could be wrong, but I think that that article may be US based, so may actually reflect the US distributor's (Roberts Cameras) information.
Harman do their own distribution in the UK - and may therefore benefit from higher margins.
The US is their biggest market, so more product is sold through Roberts than through other conduits.
The last time I bought 8x10 sheets of HP5+ it was $109 a box. At $150 a box, I doubt I will buy it again. Such a shame.
If this price increase is supposed to take effect May 11, why have prices jumped already, or have we not actually had the price increase yet??
With 30 million now unemployed and federal extended benefits scheduled to end in just a few months, Ilford's timing could not be worse. It is possible to raise prices and make less money.
No doubt but this is not the point: When I pay the price, I expect to company to take all benefit of it as it is after all the customers' interest to get the money re-invested in production. Paying the price knowing that x% shall disappear into suckers pockets make me sick, whoever takes the decision.
By parasites you mean people who have invested in the company, right? Those parasites are pretty useful people and can keep you in business.
I believe Ilford's financial records are public so you can review them if it's this important to you to verify your standards of investor purity and reinvestment are being met before purchasing their products.By parasites, I mean the huge majority of shareholders, not those investing in companies or even building it from zero. FYI, look at the percentage of financial volume used to invest in companies compared to what goes through Wall Street or the City in one year. it gives you the magnitude of parasitism.
You make good glass negs Paul , that would be my go to.That’s been my opinion for awhile now too. But even for me, there’s a limit. (I won’t even consider Kodak products in 8x10 format - they’re simply too expensive) At $6 per sheet of 8x10 HP5, I’ll be careful how I use up my remaining inventory and then switch to something less costly. The CatLabs X80 has proven to be a very good film, though with a speed compromise. At approximately $4 a sheet, it’s starting to look mighty appealing.
I do have one other alternative that’s less expensive still: for about $1.50 per negative I can make 8x10 collodion glass negatives. That’s an even more attractive alternative.
No doubt but this is not the point: When I pay the price, I expect to company to take all benefit of it as it is after all the customers' interest to get the money re-invested in production. Paying the price knowing that x% shall disappear into suckers pockets make me sick, whoever takes the decision.
A shareholder is a shareholder. Why would they not be entitled to profit from their investment?
Dali wants to specify how much money people deserve and exactly how they will use their own money. That is a lot of gall.
As for the reasons for price variation, in case you haven't noticed, Ilford products are made in the UK (and probably Germany), they have to be shipped to the US, and then shipped from where they are unloaded in the US, and there isn't anything stable right now about factors like currencies, shipment conditions and costs, and aa whole bunch of factors.
Who knows if this incredible instability is the new normal.
I thought you were dead.......With 30 million now unemployed and federal extended benefits scheduled to end in just a few months, Ilford's timing could not be worse. It is possible to raise prices and make less money.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?