Im about to finish a pack og Ilford Ortho Plus (8x10" sheet film) and a bottle of PQ Universal. I've never developed Ortho Plus in PQ before so I was wondering if anyone has any experience developing Ortho in PQ, preferably in a Jobo?
I used to shoot the earlier version for work and process in PQ Universal, the issue is contrast will be higher unless you dilute to 1+19 rather than the recommended 1+9, 6 mins would be a starting point dev time time. Years ago Ilford listed times at 1+19, that's for tray use so a touch less in a Jobo..
There are starting point guidelines for 1+19 PQ Universal and Ortho + in the Paper Developers data sheet. You may end up wanting to go to 1+29 or more to get more reasonable dev times.
Are you aiming for normal contrast (G-bar 0.62 or similar) or high/ very high contrast for various alternative processes?
There are starting point guidelines for 1+19 PQ Universal and Ortho + in the Paper Developers data sheet. You may end up wanting to go to 1+29 or more to get more reasonable dev times.
Are you aiming for normal contrast (G-bar 0.62 or similar) or high/ very high contrast for various alternative processes?
I have processed FP4 in PQ Universal at 1+29, the disadvantage of PQ Universal is a slight drop in film speed compared to ID-11/D76 around half a stop. May & Baker used to list times for Suprol at 1+29 in their datasheet (many pages). Suprol was the M & B equivalent of ID-11.
No however it will work well with Pyrocat like FP4 & HP5, I always found it similar in many ways to FP4 aside fom the different spectral sensitivity, In fact if I ran out of Ilford Ortho I'd use FP4 same development times for similar contrast just a different EI. I should add I used Ilford Ortho as a copy film for an applied application.
I have processed FP4 in PQ Universal at 1+29, the disadvantage of PQ Universal is a slight drop in film speed compared to ID-11/D76 around half a stop.
I've never been quite sure why Ilford suggest such a significant drop in speed for Ortho + in PQ Universal (80 to 25) at G-bar 0.62. Something to test, I guess - my usage of PQ and Ortho + has been largely darkroom based & I've tended to make a test strip anyway, so effective speed in PQ Universal is not really an issue I've ever bothered to get too involved in.
I've never been quite sure why Ilford suggest such a significant drop in speed for Ortho + in PQ Universal (80 to 25) at G-bar 0.62. Something to test, I guess - my usage of PQ and Ortho + has been largely darkroom based & I've tended to make a test strip anyway, so effective speed in PQ Universal is not really an issue I've ever bothered to get too involved in.
I'm not convinced about the difference in phenidones - Ilford suggest that if you develop to G-bar 0.8-1.0 you'll largely get full speed, or maybe a bit over it. I suspect it may have more to do with curve shape - it seems to deliver a potentially quite a short toe (from what I recall of using it with Delta 100) and then a fairly solidly straight line thereafter. It would be interesting to compare to Ilfosol 3 in terms of sharpness (especially in terms of the use of what seems to be phenidones' inhibition-based sharpness).