BradS said:Hmmm, further testing indicates that I fumbled the mix. Chemistrynever was my stong point! I remember the Chem labs in college...every week, somebody in my group would break all the glasware and we'd end up dry labbing it. Thank G-d for plain M&Ms!
Brad.
BradS said:Hi Tom,
Thanks for the detailed reply. Except for the Potasium Bromide, I thought I followed the directions you posted above almost to the letter. I used only Part A and the part with the Carbonate. Anyway, I suspect that I may have left the Metol out of part A...that's the only thing I can think of. I ended up souping sheet #2 in the D-23 that I mixed up earlier in the week (my first home brewed dev!). That worked fine.
I shoot mainly FP-4 and TXP but, have some Efke R 100 that I'd like to try in the Beutler's so, will try again.
Thank you again Tom. Oh, and does ten minutes sound about right for FP-4 in Beutlers?
Ole said:Part of the problem is the term "Beutler's". What I published in the articles is Willi Beutler's Standard Developers for Plates and Papers, mixed in varying proportions with verying amounts of water depending on use, film type, exposure, etcetera.
Most references to "Beutler's" means one specific dilution/combination of these parts, which is supposed to be more or less the same as Neofin Blau.
"Beutler's Neofin-like Developer" can easily be mixed from the basic solutions. But so can a lot of other developers!
8 minutes is just about my standard developing time for ISO 100-ish films in Neofin/BND. It tends to give a little extra speed, a little extra contrast, and be a lot easier (IMO) to get a great print from on G2 paper. I like lots of local contrast, and this gives it without overdeveloping the highlights beyond printability.
Not very much. It's primary function is to reduce fog. A well-tuned developer mixed should have minimum fog withoug losing shadow detail (=sensitivity), but IMO it's better to have some fog than to risk losing shadow detail. "Beutler's" should give low fog levels anyway.anyhuus said:... How significant to dev. time and EI is the adding of potassium bromide?...
Thanks, what one usually sees is this "Leica-dose" version.dancqu said:Ole posted A, C, D formulas for compounding with
varying proportions a number of developers. The "Beutler"
blend, Leica-dose, uses half, volumetrically, the amount of C.
anyhuus said:I have for some time been trying the FP4/Beutler combination, and like the thread-starter I have wondered about the dev.time. I see that 9-10 minutes have been recommended several places, and that's where I started aswell (with an EI of 100 ASA). But I got terrible negs (way too overexposed and blocked highlights) In addition, I also read somewhere that the Beutler is supposed to be a speed-enhancing developer, but I could not find any data on this for the FP4. This led me to conduct the tests described by Lambrecht and Woodhouse in their book "Way Beyond Monochrome" and I have some results that might be of interest.
dev.time average relative log exp
(minutes) gamma speedpoint
6 0,51 0,41
7 0,59 0,26
9 0,67 0,15
I know this is perhaps too few samples, but it gives an indication. Drawing the curves base on these data, as described in the aforementioned book led to this result:
N-1: 6 minutes EI = just above 100 ASA
N: 6 min 50 sec. EI = 150 ASA
N+1: 9 minutes EI = 200 ASA (!)
Are these consistent with the experience of other FP4/Beutler-fans?
BradS said:I've not got round to mixing up another batch of
Beutler's but, will again soon. I've been playing with
D-23 followed by a 1.5% Borax afterbath.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?