Ilford archival washing/toning sequence

Hydrangeas from the garden

A
Hydrangeas from the garden

  • 2
  • 2
  • 69
Field #6

D
Field #6

  • 7
  • 1
  • 78
Hosta

A
Hosta

  • 16
  • 10
  • 159
Water Orchids

A
Water Orchids

  • 5
  • 1
  • 92

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,925
Messages
2,766,925
Members
99,506
Latest member
advika2127
Recent bookmarks
0

Jonathan R

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
86
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
I have quite a number of Ilford MG FB prints that I printed and selenium-toned in make-shift darkrooms up to 30 years ago, and they are fine. Now, I have a dedicated darkroom, but my prints stain as soon as I put them in the toner. The procedure I am currently following is:
Ilford MG paper developer
Tetenal Indicet stop bath
Ilford Rapid fixer (1 minute only)
Rinse, running water, 5 minutes
Water bath hold until end of session
Wash in running water 45 min
Ilford Washaid
Kodak Selenium toner
...and then I would wash archivally if only the d**n things didn't stain.

I have seen Ilford's recommended archival wash sequence, which involves using toner diluted with washaid straight after the fixer. I am hesitant to try this, because (a) I understand it makes the toner essentially a one-shot bath; and (b) I can't see that why it would be an improvement on what I am already doing.

I have read a lot of older threads here and elsewhere, and folk seem to divide into two camps over this (have problems, can't explain, or no problems ever). Does anyone have any chemical insights that might help me here?

Thanks in anticipation.
 

adelorenzo

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Messages
1,421
Location
Whitehorse, Yukon
Format
4x5 Format
I believe you do the Washaid before the wash, not after? That's what I do with Hypo-Clear at any rate. It helps make the fixer become more water soluble.

I go straight from the fixer into a holding bath of Hypo-Clear until I am done printing. Then I do a 5-10 minute wash, toner, and then final washing. I'm probably doing it wrong but it's working for me.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,248
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
That seems like a very short fix time for FB prints.
 

adelorenzo

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Messages
1,421
Location
Whitehorse, Yukon
Format
4x5 Format
Ilford's own "optimimum permanence" processing sequence only calls for 1 minute in the fix. My prints generally go for 1 minute or two but sometimes longer if I forget about them. :smile:

Jonathan, I think you should try replacing your water holding bath with washaid.
 

Mike Crawford

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2006
Messages
614
Location
London, UK
Format
Medium Format
I have not used the Ilford method myself, but from what I remember, the fixer is one minute at 1+4 not 1+9, though I would check with a published Ilford guide. Wash aid / Hypo Clear would need to be soon after the hypo not after the wash I would reckon.
 

jcc

Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
489
Location
Norman, Okla
Format
Multi Format
I fix or four to five minutes, with constant agitation. One minute is very short for fibre, IMO, and I would expect the paper to turn.

Anyhow, after fixing, I go straight to a selenium toner (duration depends on tone I want to achieve), then wash for 5 minutes, then hypo clearing agent for a minute or two, then archival wash for at least 30 minutes.
 

MartinP

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
1,569
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
I assume that you have made a typo in the order of your steps? The one minute strong rapid-fixer (better with two-bath method), minimal hold time, a short wash of the print, washaid, the long wash of the print (which is then much shorter than usual, thanks to the washaid).

Toning comes afterwards and/or gets complicated, and selenium mixes often contain fixer, so another quick-wash - washaid - long-wash scenario comes up. It is easy to push the manufacturers recommended wet times, but what can one do . . .
 

Alan Ross

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
22
Location
Santa Fe, Ne
Format
Multi Format
Toning problems

I have quite a number of Ilford MG FB prints that I printed and selenium-toned in make-shift darkrooms up to 30 years ago, and they are fine. Now, I have a dedicated darkroom, but my prints stain as soon as I put them in the toner. The procedure I am currently following is:
Ilford MG paper developer
Tetenal Indicet stop bath
Ilford Rapid fixer (1 minute only)
Rinse, running water, 5 minutes
Water bath hold until end of session
Wash in running water 45 min
Ilford Washaid
Kodak Selenium toner
...and then I would wash archivally if only the d**n things didn't stain.

I have seen Ilford's recommended archival wash sequence, which involves using toner diluted with washaid straight after the fixer. I am hesitant to try this, because (a) I understand it makes the toner essentially a one-shot bath; and (b) I can't see that why it would be an improvement on what I am already doing.

I have read a lot of older threads here and elsewhere, and folk seem to divide into two camps over this (have problems, can't explain, or no problems ever). Does anyone have any chemical insights that might help me here?

Thanks in anticipation.

Hi Jonathan,

There are two things that will cause a print to stain in Selenium toner:
•The print is not fixed thoroughly, or
• there is residual acid in the paper fibers

I have been working almost exclusively with Ilford MG since the early/mid '80s, using Ilford's short fixing procedure since that time. No problems, here.

It would seem that you have rinsed the prints sufficiently to not have acid content as an issue. The Ilford Rapid Fix should be just fine if mixed 1:4 with water, fixing WITH CONTINUOUS agitation FOR 45-60 seconds.

Like you, I rinse the prints in a tray of slightly running water for a minute or more, then transfer to a large tray or sink for the duration of my session. The prints can then go directly into a tray of toner (MGFB at 1:10 for 3' or the new Classic for about 3' at 1:20). Next a water rinse. Next the wash-aid of your choice. Then I put the prints in fresh water THEN into archival washers for maybe 20 minutes depending on the washer.

Good luck!

Alan
www.alanrossphotography.com
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
I believe you do the Washaid before the wash, not after? That's what I do with Hypo-Clear at any rate. It helps make the fixer become more water soluble.

I go straight from the fixer into a holding bath of Hypo-Clear until I am done printing. Then I do a 5-10 minute wash, toner, and then final washing. I'm probably doing it wrong but it's working for me.

That would work but you are correct the OP has not read the Ilford wash aid instructions and got the steps in wrong sequence.

You also need to read the hypo clear instructions too sorry for archival perm

fix, rinse off fix, hypo clear, holding bath preferably sink syphon slow run

the rinse of fix protects the hypo clear for the whole scession all the prints get fresh hypo clear with minimal hypo carry over...

our corvettes just used sea water while they were taking U boat pennant number shots no desalination plants
 

nworth

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
2,228
Location
Los Alamos,
Format
Multi Format
The time in the fixer depends on the fixer. I use 2 minutes in ordinary, non-hardening rapid fixer (F-34) with continuous tray tilt agitation. I don't know the composition of the Ilford fixer, but there are fixers that will work properly in about a minute. I also don't know what is in the Ilford Washaid, but I am a bit surprised at its use after the final wash and immediately before toning, without a rinse. (Of course, there would be a wash after toning.)
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
I have read the instructions I just choose not to follow them. :smile: Some year I'll make a print worth keeping and then I'll worry about archival permanence...

Ok but the title of the thread was ...archival...

Id be more careful about your prints, year before last at Xmas I was visiting my boss, (lady) from 40 years ago, and removed the camera bag from auto as it was -5C and falling.

So her greeting on doorstep was 'you still take photos?'
Then 'The picture on my bed side table of the children is one of yours (- sic from 40 years ago).'

Undirected candid of boy and girl happily playing together on Kchrome 25 1/30 f/1.4 M2 35mm lux, but value of print to her nostalgia, they were just end of roll shots for me, at the time.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2002
Messages
3,575
Location
Eugene, Oregon
Format
4x5 Format
Hi Jonathan,

There are two things that will cause a print to stain in Selenium toner:
•The print is not fixed thoroughly, or
• there is residual acid in the paper fibers
...

Alan has your answer.

Since you rinse enough to ensure that the prints are not too acid, you can likely suspect inadequate fixing or contamination.

There are quite a few things to consider here.

First, if you insist on using the single-bath method with film-strength fixer, be aware that the capacity of your fixer is very small. Ilford states it is only 10 8x10s per liter before residual silver in the fixing bath is beyond limits for optimum permanence. Be sure you aren't overusing your fixer. However, the first few prints through your fresh fixer should be fixed well and should not stain in selenium. If you are getting staining on these, then look elsewhere.

As others have mentioned, the wash aid before the selenium toning may be the culprit. And, as mentioned before, the wash-aid treatment should come after the toner, just before the wash. It's easy to fix that...

As for mixing the toner with wash-aid: forget it. It is old-school and wasteful. Selenium toner will live forever if replenished and filtered before use. There is no need to toss an active (and potentially dangerous) selenium-rich solution into the environment just because the wash-aid capacity has been reached.

So, mix your toner without wash aid and use the wash aid after toning. Use fresh fix, or better, a two-bath fixing sequence (which Ilford recommends before toning, by the way...) and you should have no staining problems.

------------------------------------------

Also, you should know that the entire "strong-fast fix" method that Ilford espouses is based on limiting the amount of fixer that makes it to the fibers of the paper base. The idea is that stronger and faster will fix all the halides in the emulsion before the fixer seeps into the paper base and thus reduce wash times. The time it takes for fix to reach the paper base is just over one minute. If you are fixing a bit too long, you might as well change techniques. Also, the Ilford sequence may not work for other products besides Ilford's... I don't believe Ilford tested with other manufacturers' papers or chemicals. Fixing too long with this method won't cause inadequate fixing, but it will require longer wash times.

I long ago decided that a conventional two-bath fixing sequence using a rapid fixer and then the associated longer washing times was a better method for my work flow.

FWIW, I use Ilford Rapid Fix or Hypam 1+9. I fix for 1.5-2 minutes in each bath, and discard the first bath after a 36 8x10 per liter capacity is reached.

I tone in separate session to printing. When printing, the prints get the first fix and are then washed (min. one hour) and dried. Keeper prints are collected and toned in a later toning session.

My toning work flow is: water pre-soak (5 minutes), fix two (in freshly-mixed fixer, 1.5-2 minutes, again with a 36 8x10-print-per-liter capacity), then directly into the selenium toner. Prints are toned visually until the desired tonal change is achieved and then go directly into a homemade wash-aid. (Yes, the capacity of the wash-aid could be increased by inserting a rinse after the toner, but sodium sulfite is cheap and I don't need the extra step.) The prints are agitated for three minutes and then simply collect in the wash-aid bath till I have twelve to load the washer with. Wash time is a minimum of one hour.

I test regularly for residual silver and hypo and always have had excellent results.

Maybe my sequence can work for you as well.

Best,

Doremus
 

Roger Cole

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
Thanks Doremus, I got some tips for improved process from that.

I agree that, if some prints stain but the first ones through the fixer don't, it's most likely over used fixer. I've used two bath fixing but been getting to print too seldom so I went back to to single bath fixing and found what was said here - the life if the fixer is less than half what you would expect with conventional fixing times, even with a single bath. 10 8x10s per litter may be a tad conservative but not much. When using a single bath I stop at 20 8x10s per half gallon. More use risks stains in toning and under fixing even without it. I suspect a longer, conventional fix time would still work ok for somewhat more capacity but at the expense of longer wash times.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
OP
OP

Jonathan R

Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
86
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
Friends, I had not expected any responses until after the Christmas break, but two whole pages of thoughtful advice is humbling. Thanks to all.

I think my problem probably is with incomplete fixing. I have been using only a single fixing bath, because it seemed difficult to use two if the total fix time was to be limited to 1 minute. Also, I couldn't see the point in having fixer soak into the fibre base if one could instead have something simpler to wash out, like acetic acid. It's hard to believe that there is residual acid in the paper before I tone, because of the long first wash and the Washaid. No typo there, by the way, I did use the Washaid immediately before the toner. That was maybe mistaken, given the intended function of the Washaid, but it surely wouldn't be a cause of the staining, if it's OK to mix the toner with Washaid?

But it's also odd that I got staining yesterday, because I mixed fresh chemicals and put through only 5 12x16 sheets before starting to tone. Admittedly, the first one in the toner was the last one printed.

OK, it's a 2-bath fix for me next time. Will report how things go. Merry Christmas, all.
 

Steve Smith

Member
Joined
May 3, 2006
Messages
9,109
Location
Ryde, Isle o
Format
Medium Format
1 minute for FB in fresh Ilford Rapid Fixer (1+4) is correct. Works great. For RC papers it is shorter.

What is the reason for needing longer for fibre based paper? As the emulsion is on the outer surface, I would have thought they would be the same.

I can appreciate why it would need more washing as the paper itself will absorb more.


Steve.
 

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,926
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
There is always some sort of supercoat / protective layer over the emulsion so I guess the supercoats differ from FB to RC.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2006
Messages
875
Location
Oklahoma, US
Format
Multi Format
that's a sign of underfixing. start using a 2fixing bath procedure.residual silver will stain in he toner.

I believe Ralph may have the answer. I never get staining. I place fiber prints in a hold tray. I start with a 5 min rinse. Prints are toned, 5 min rinse, 10 min wash aid, 20-30 min manual tray wash. I do not mix toner with a wash aid.

I limit fix capacity to (10) 8x10 prints per L. per Ilford's directions for optimum permanence.

I use a two tray fix work flow when printing a 8x12 image on 11x14. Fix capacity limited to no more than 15 prints per L. I use a citrus stop and TF-4 fix. Total fix time no more than 90s. Fix prepared to film strength ratio per manufacture's directions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

adelorenzo

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2012
Messages
1,421
Location
Whitehorse, Yukon
Format
4x5 Format
I just remembered that I'm using Ilford 2000 RT fixer which might make a difference? Even though it's for RC paper I am using it for FB paper and also film. My fixing times are very short and I get a lot of prints out of 1 L of working solution.

With a minute or two in the fix, a soak in hypo-clear and a 5 minute wash in my print washer I have never had any staining when toning.
 

sepiareverb

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Messages
1,103
Location
St J Vermont
Format
Multi Format
I had staining in my last darkroom due to iron, rusty "copper" screws holding in my "copper" pipe clamps for the sink. This time I went with stainless & plastic for the pipe clamps and have rust from nails coming through the basement ceiling from the flooring above. Lots of dabbing with epoxy paint or silicone caulk in my near future.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom