• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

If you were formulating an new film developer...

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
201,879
Messages
2,831,663
Members
100,998
Latest member
mktoy
Recent bookmarks
0

SchwinnParamount

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 29, 2004
Messages
1,776
Location
Tacoma, WA
Format
4x5 Format
What "markers" would tell you that your brainchild succeeded?

  1. Lack of base fog AND adequate density?
  2. Contrast range that gives good tonality on contrast grade 2 paper?
  3. your next marker...

In brief, what tells you that your new film developer formula is a success?
 

Rudeofus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
5,119
Location
EU
Format
Medium Format
My approach would be:
  1. Find out what detective quantum efficiency (DQE) is
  2. Find out how to do tests to measure DQE
  3. Create a developer which improves DQE over Xtol
  4. Find a balance between speed, grain and sharpness that suits your need
 

mrred

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 8, 2009
Messages
1,251
Location
Montreal, Ca
Format
Multi Format
I've seen it discussed here that Kodak would ask how different from any other developer they made. If it was not that different, they moved on.

There is so much out there already, unless someone comes up with a new developer compound, what we have already is it.

Me, i play with single purpose stuff. Like adding glycine to d72 to build up better mid tones. In my opinion, the big stuff has been done.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
 

alanrockwood

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 11, 2006
Messages
2,195
Format
Multi Format
Another approach, make a developer out of easily obtainable ingredients: tylenol (reacted with lye to make para-aminophenol) from the drug store, ascorbic acid from the health food store, sodium ascorbate from the health food store, washing soda (sodium carbonate) from the grocery store, borax from the grocery store, maybe sodium bicarbonate from the grocery store, instant coffee from the grocery store, sodium sulfite from the swimming pool store, etc.

The idea here is photographic survival when the end of the world comes, or when vendors of photographic chemicals leave the business, whichever comes first.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,223
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
A developer that ships as a pre-mixed powder, but mixes up into a one litre, highly concentrated stock solution in either water or glycol. The water based stock should have a shelf life of at least 6 months in a half filled bottle. The glycol based stock should have a much longer shelf life. Either stock should be easy to mix, at or near room temperature. The powder itself must be easy and safe to handle.

The mixed stock should be usable in working strength dilutions that range between 1+9 through 1+29, with the potential of using more dilute versions for stand or semi-stand developing.

The developer should be usable in a replenishment regime, where the developer serves as its own replenisher.

The developer should be environmentally relatively benign, without being particularly susceptible to water quality variations.

A package of developer (sufficient to make 1 litre of stock) should sell for no more than $10.00 CDN. The package itself should be well sealed, strong and easy for retailers to either display or ship (without any hazardous goods concerns).

Simple right?:wink:

Please report back when you have made progress:whistling:
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
What "markers" would tell you that your brainchild succeeded?

  1. Lack of base fog AND adequate density?
  2. Contrast range that gives good tonality on contrast grade 2 paper?
  3. your next marker...

In brief, what tells you that your new film developer formula is a success?



ease of use, and flexibility of use.
to me basefog &c play second fiddle to how easy it is to mix and use ...

( that's why i "invented" Dcaffenol, and sumatranol130 before that ... not really invent but mixed together
it must have been like mamie taylor asking for what is now known as a mamie taylor ...
the barkeep must have been out of rum when she asked for a dark and stormy, so she might have said: just throw the cheapest
scotch you have in there, instead ... )
 

Alan Johnson

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 16, 2004
Messages
3,381
Another approach, make a developer out of easily obtainable ingredients: tylenol (reacted with lye to make para-aminophenol) from the drug store, ascorbic acid from the health food store, sodium ascorbate from the health food store, washing soda (sodium carbonate) from the grocery store, borax from the grocery store, maybe sodium bicarbonate from the grocery store, instant coffee from the grocery store, sodium sulfite from the swimming pool store, etc.

The idea here is photographic survival when the end of the world comes, or when vendors of photographic chemicals leave the business, whichever comes first.

Been there, done that, start on post 28:
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
There are substances with solvent properties that could be added to PC-TEA which have not been investigated, including their potential hazards.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom