Of the 5 enlargers that I own, there is only one that I would keep, if I had to get rid of all the others. I only do B&W and my old Omega D11 is the only one that would allow me to continue working with 35mm, 120, and 4x5. It has been converted to an D11V by adding a variable condenser and has a nice. "cool" LED lamp house that won't "pop" my negatives. And I can still get parts for it. I would cry like a baby if I had to give-up my Valoy 2 but it only does one format.......Regards!In line with the never ending, much too often occurring "If you could keep just one camera ..." and "If you were ship wrecked on a deserted island and had nothing available to eat, which camera would you choose?" threads, I hereby open the "If you could keep just one enlarger ..." thread!
I would keep my Chromega Dichroic II 5D-XL enlarger. Why? Because it is the only enlarger I have ever owned.
I would love to use an old Elwood but I already have one hernia and don't need any more. The Elwood sisters sure built some heavy but rigid enlargers.........Regards!My poor "little" Beseler 45 with the dichroic color head. That is the only enlarger I have room for in my tiny little closet.
I also have a very nice Leitz V35 that has not been set up in years but I love it so much for 35mm that I refuse to part with it.
Finally, I have an old Elwood enlarger (read that to mean sometime shortly after Edison invented the light bulb) that I am slowly but surely cleaning up and getting ready for use. Not sure where I will put it when it is ready to go because it is a monster for sure.
Elwoods are featherweight compared to some. I carried an 8x10 very slowly into my house, then back out a few months later. I used a 5x7 Elwood for years, cast aluminum good old beasts. Elwood actually silvered the inside of the dome. 8x10 takes 500W bulb, smokin' !I would love to use an old Elwood but I already have one hernia and don't need any more. The Elwood sisters sure built some heavy but rigid enlargers.........Regards!
either omega E4, a bare bulb ( not enlarging much ) or the beam of light.
I just got enlarger envy. Durst are very well built. I had a chance to buy a Laborator but didn't end up buying it. But I've owned and used a Beseler 45MXT for over 30 years and they're sturdy. Your Durst is a better enlarger.My Durst can do everything from 35mm to 8x10. Here it is setup for some 4x5 printing with the LARABOX 450 and a 150mm lens.
View attachment 231396
They're so cute when they're littleMy Durst can do everything from 35mm to 8x10. Here it is setup for some 4x5 printing with the LARABOX 450 and a 150mm lens.
View attachment 231396
Durst 138.
Just bought the AN glass for the negative holder and the spare lamps I have should be enough for many many years of wet printing work.
Nothing better. Makes every other enlarger look like a 1975 Pinto.My 4x5 LPL VC head. Very nice to use. Parts are easily available since they are currently being manufactured. I also have a dichroic head for it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?